NRL Fantasy 2019 Part 79

wolfking wrote:

Doesn't look like it mate.  You'll get Nikora's score regardless.

Wouldn't I get Twal instead of Taumalolo, Staggs instead of Smith, and then Verrills/Nikora instead of Coates

hymenbustas wrote:Has the score updated for the Parra game yet

Jarrow 48
Peats 60
Whitbread 29

Moses 61
Mahoney 55
Nrown 37
Mau 79

hymenbustas wrote:Has the score updated for the Parra game yet

Doesn't look like it.

Chewie wrote:Looks like Verbal is making a comeback
Watch your back MTB

Fmd a banner really changes things eh?!

Would love an 80+ from Cook(c) ....

Additionally, love me some Kotoni Staggs and him digging in for me tonight

wolfking wrote:

hymenbustas wrote:Has the score updated for the Parra game yet

Doesn't look like it.

I think they have, not just much movement.

Ben Marlin wrote:
Wouldn't I get Twal instead of Taumalolo, Staggs instead of Smith, and then Verrills/Nikora instead of Coates

Check with the experts but I thought 16 and 17 would be replaced with Twal and Staggs. I'm not sure now mate.

Mulvy wrote:

SI wrote:

Legend!  

How's Steve going? I remember him having a set-back a few months ago. Is he going okay?

Was referring to rhino, but you are correct, so is Nicholls.

SI wrote:

I think they have, not just much movement.

Possibly. All look similar. Can't see any differences but you're probably righy. They are normally well updated by now.

my tv broke wrote:

Fmd a banner really changes things eh?!

Would love an 80+ from Cook(c) ....

Additionally, love me some Kotoni Staggs and him digging in for me tonight

please god no. both my h2h final and eliminator opponents captained Cook, and I want him to get sub 60 to give me an edge as a moses captainer.

SI wrote:I hope LB has MS Paint warmed up for that banner.

Are there still banners? I went camping and came back to the new look and I was worried there'd been a catastrophe

Just updated now;

Peats 59
Arrow 50
Bred 27

Gutho 43
Moses 61
Mahoney 54
Mau 79
Nrown 36

Ben Marlin wrote:
Wouldn't I get Twal instead of Taumalolo, Staggs instead of Smith, and then Verrills/Nikora instead of Coates

Thats the way I read it. But dont trust me and the gins Ive had

wolfking wrote:

SI wrote:

I think they have, not just much movement.

Possibly. All look similar.  Can't see any differences but you're probably righy.  They are normally well updated by now.

I think we caught them mid update. Peats back to 59 but Fotu and Jarrow defs just changed.

wolfking wrote:

Check with the experts but I thought 16 and 17 would be replaced with Twal and Staggs.  I'm not sure now mate.

All good mate

5.8. EMERGENCY PLAYERS
These are players whose priority-order is numbered 5 to 8 on your Reserves Bench. These players do not score any points for your team unless they are required as part of an auto-emergency substitution.
Should any of the players in a team's Starting 17 not take the field (DNP) a player from the Reserves bench will be automatically substituted in, based on the following criteria;
1. We only calculate the replacing and covering of players as of full lockout (i.e. from the start of the last game of the round),
2. The highest-ranked eligible player from the Reserves Bench (numbered 1 to will substitute for a DNP player from the Starting 13 unless that bench player is a dual-position player (DPP) required as cover for a another DNP player. This process can happen for up to four(4) DNP,
3. Once it has been calculated which bench (1- players will be the automatic emergency replacements, the remainder of the Reserves Bench will 'shuffle up' in order to cover bench positions 1 to 4. This 'shuffling' will be shown with a highlight.
An eligible DPP can only auto-substitute for one DNP player.
If the process of applying automatic emergencies results in fewer than 17 players scoring points a team’s total score for that round will be the aggregate total of only those players who have scored points.

Gee I never thought I would cause so much fuss the last few days. Maybe I’ll change my tack next year and keep my team secret

wolfking wrote:

Thought you were blatantly taking the piss haha.

Haha, no, all I'm saying is, if you have a question about who do I get if X is in emergencies and Y is in my 17, it's generally impossible to answer without knowing the position of your entire 21.

Yeah looks like you guys are right.  Sorry for the dud advice.

I still think you'd have to choose one to play nevertheless Ben.

danseels1985 wrote:Gee I never thought I would cause so much fuss the last few days. Maybe I’ll change my tack next year and keep my team secret

I appreciate the effort people go to to post their teams, including you.
I'd ask for way more advice but a whole team is a lot of characters.

Mulvy wrote:

Haha, no, all I'm saying is, if you have a question about who do I get if X is in emergencies and Y is in my 17, it's generally impossible to answer without knowing the position of your entire 21.

Lol yeah I know.

danseels1985 wrote:Maybe I’ll change my tack next year and keep my team secret

no fucking chance.