White Lightning wrote:So in the last half an hour both Burns & Aubs have become traps. Burns because he'll only play 60 mins & Aubs because J. Morris will be there round 2.
Pretty much. Yeh.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
White Lightning wrote:So in the last half an hour both Burns & Aubs have become traps. Burns because he'll only play 60 mins & Aubs because J. Morris will be there round 2.
Yep and my 9th draft has just happened for today, back to shit centres and a Moses and Cleary halves combo plus bringing Carty Party back in!White Lightning wrote:So in the last half an hour both Burns & Aubs have become traps. Burns because he'll only play 60 mins & Aubs because J. Morris will be there round 2.
Rabbits21 wrote:
How many mins does Mikaele get?
White Lightning wrote:So in the last half an hour both Burns & Aubs have become traps. Burns because he'll only play 60 mins & Aubs because J. Morris will be there round 2.
WT2K wrote:
All guess work. 40mins is what I'm thinking. Aloiai will most likely be part of the prop rotation
Erin Moleman wrote:Kennedy is risky as. Dugan could easily play fb. Dugan, katoa, ramien, xerri, ronaldo. Plus moyza back pushes dugan to a wing. Kennedy could be a one week kind of thing
Archer wrote:
As far as I'm aware the whole 'game in disrepute' stuff all falls under the no fault umbrella (would just be in the discretionary part) so in that sense they've already made a decision on it. As for the club, not sure.
Can only assume either
a) they have punished him behind the scenes in some way (maybe they've asked him to agree to a change in contract terms similar to what Wighton has?), or
b) They changed to only take a hard line stance when forced to by the NRL after getting no real benefit from doing so previously, or
c) They have looked at all the info we don't have and don't think Scott is in the wrong (or its grey perhaps).
I mean i hear you, but what i was talking about was the no fault stand down says that anything under 11 years can still be stood down at the NRL's discretion. My assumption is this is how they would deal with anything less than that but that they previously would have called "bringing the game into disrepute".easytiger wrote:
I think they all might just be waiting for Natural justice to play out.
It's not a serious criminal offence with a max 11 year prison sentence so doesn't fall under the "no-fault stand down" as far as NRL is concerned.
He's next back in front of court March 20. I think any club/NRL imposed suspension will happen if the court reaches a guilty verdict, as he is still facing 7 charges.
StormTrooper96 wrote:I am not looking at my team until this afternoon. I don't know how you guys who change your team every 10 minutes keep your head on your shoulders.
B Burns, NOT B Burns! Important not to confuse the two. Also don't confuse the DFifi's.Bethany_B wrote:Wait, what's this talk of Burns playing 60 minutes? Which Burns is it even?
Archer wrote:
B Burns, NOT B Burns! Important not to confuse the two. Also don't confuse the DFifi's.
Also, my assumption is they're referring to the bunnies burns as he's the one people would have interest in.
Bethany_B wrote:
Sure, but where's the info coming from? I had a look at nrl.com and /r/nrl and couldn't find any info on Braidon Burns playing 60 minutes.