One of the scenarios I foresee is some clubs folding or merging.
12 team comp is a real possibility out of this though I really, really, really hope it doesn't come to that :/
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
White Lightning wrote:
Tapine was named at lock & Horsburgh 2fr but once the game started they swapped positions.
Not yet. The question was if he continues to play under 50 minutes. It’s too soon for that!multiple.scoregasms wrote:
Knight scored 6 points above his BE and you want to trade him out....
filthridden wrote:So who are the most financially vulnerable clubs? Sharks have been on the brink for a few years and everyone is aware of that... who else is in the bottom four or five?
One of the scenarios I foresee is some clubs folding or merging.
12 team comp is a real possibility out of this though I really, really, really hope it doesn't come to that :/
WT2K wrote:With Herbert and Hiku flying back to NZ... Who comes in for them assuming R2 does go on
Any large international will have seen the havoc caused in many parts of the world and changing things significantly from those learnings.Mighty Fishes wrote:Apple shutting its doors worldwide
Pookus McFly wrote:I’ve had a pretty poor round with Ese’ese, Wakeham and Stimson. Low ownership players stinking it up (and seconds from EZY being my only flop ). I know it’s only round 1 and the consensus will be to play it calm, but I am thinking of doing the unspeakable by pulling funds from my team for corrections. If I didn’t have two gun centres (also have Aubbs ). I probably wouldn’t, but at this point it’s looking pretty frivolous when I need to put cash elsewhere. I have BJ Leilua set to play today but I could swap him for Musgrove and play Wiliame instead (currently in my NPRs). This frees up cash so that essentially instead of doing Wakeham>Mann (just about my only move atm), I can do Wakeham>Isaako (via Drinkwater). Leaves no WFB/CTR cover on my bench but my team looks a great deal stronger and I pick up the only real “must-haves” for my mind for the round (also doing Ezy>Horse).
Tl;dr
BJ Leilua + Mann upvote
Wiliame + Isaako downvote
filthridden wrote:So who are the most financially vulnerable clubs? Sharks have been on the brink for a few years and everyone is aware of that... who else is in the bottom four or five?
One of the scenarios I foresee is some clubs folding or merging.
12 team comp is a real possibility out of this though I really, really, really hope it doesn't come to that :/
filthridden wrote:Tossing up between Musgrove and Walters for that last spot in the 17.
Upvote: Walters
Downvote: Musgrove
trubluwanksta wrote:
Sharks, Tigers, Titans, Manly, Bulldogs?
filthridden wrote:So who are the most financially vulnerable clubs? Sharks have been on the brink for a few years and everyone is aware of that... who else is in the bottom four or five?
One of the scenarios I foresee is some clubs folding or merging.
12 team comp is a real possibility out of this though I really, really, really hope it doesn't come to that :/
Erin Moleman wrote:
I agree Murray is such a waste on an edge, looked like he wasn’t comfortable at all. Bennett is a stubborn bugger though he’ll probably persist just out of spite
mattnz wrote:
Any large international will have seen the havoc caused in many parts of the world and changing things significantly from those learnings.
I work for a medium sized multinational and they just announced over the weekend that all staff that can work from home will work from home globally.
White Lightning wrote:
I agree Murray should say to Wayne unless I play lock I'm off to another club.
SoylentGreen wrote:
Do players see lock as a 'better' position than edge back row? Or is that just a fantasy projection
Chewie wrote:Curious to see how Walters goes today. He's got 40% ownership, but may not be in everyone's 17.