NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 65 - 60 Minutes, Fantasy edition

Mulva wrote:Hi all,
Tatola looks really good at his price and a good POD but could also bring in B.Sironen and save cash and move Carrigan to FRF if B.Sironen can produce same scores as Tatola. Thoughts?

The name makes a lot of burnt Fantasy players cringe, but not a bad shout this season. Welshy might fire up though after being more than burnt previously, bloke got absolutely flamed by him from memory.

Hahahahaha that is not a try, where has the ball hit the ground???

Ball-carrying elbow down, tackle completed. No try, you can't wriggle around for ever.

I think it's a no try because he's held and lost all momentum. He creates more momentum. If that's before the line it's a double movement.

Picking SJ over DCE a few weeks ago really stings with all the tries DCE is scoring now. Was on a real dry spell until recently

Hope SJ puts his running boots on the next few weeks

MilfordTheMagician wrote:Hahahahaha that is not a try, where has the ball hit the ground???

I know what you're saying mate, and I would have said no Try, but it went upstairs as a Try and not conclusive otherwise.

standard-issue wrote:

I know what you're saying mate, and I would have said no Try, but it went upstairs as a Try and not conclusive otherwise.

Literally the only reason it was given is because Perenara sent it up as a try. Half the time the on-field refs don't even see the ball hit the ground but send it up as a try, it's ridiculous.

I dont like that the player is allowed to keep fighting. Think the tackle is complete. Anyway.

Reckon cust should stay at 6. Walker left centre

MilfordTheMagician wrote:

Literally the only reason it was given is because Perenara sent it up as a try. Half the time the on-field refs don't even see the ball hit the ground but send it up as a try, it's ridiculous.

If you think the video was conclusive that he didnt score.. well i cant help you.

Imo he probably didnt, but its not certain. Refs call correct

Robson back on lesssgo

standard-issue wrote:

I know what you're saying mate, and I would have said no Try, but it went upstairs as a Try and not conclusive otherwise.

It wasn’t the grounding that was inconclusive, it was clearly a second effort.

Drinkwater - DCE trade looking good

my tv broke wrote:I dont like that the player is allowed to keep fighting. Think the tackle is complete. Anyway.

Reckon cust should stay at 6. Walker left centre

Agreed, it's another subjective rule as to how long they can keep trying to ground it. Maxwell said he didn;t lose momentum, well that's subjective as well, not sure what the answer is.

KingTeddy wrote:Robson back on lesssgo

Probably only because Cotter got kung-fud in the head.

Should challenge

hymenbustas wrote:

standard-issue wrote:

I know what you're saying mate, and I would have said no Try, but it went upstairs as a Try and not conclusive otherwise.

It wasn’t the grounding that was inconclusive, it was clearly a second effort.

Maxwell called it as not losing momentum, our games loves subjectivity unfortunately.

standard-issue wrote:

Maxwell called it as not losing momentum, our games loves subjectivity unfortunately.

Its a subjective game, cant change that. Just gotta accept the refs call on those and move on tbh

my tv broke wrote:

If you think the video was conclusive that he didnt score.. well i cant help you.

Imo he probably didnt, but its not certain. Refs call correct

Seemed conclusive to me, considering you couldn't see the ball hitting the ground? Same deal as the one in the first half where the video ref overturned the decision because the ball was held up, literally the same scenario but different outcome. Stupid.

Fuck it I’m gonna bring in CS9,next week Luai and Young will become a cashout and Moses/Tevaga. Will leave me with 4 trades though eeek. Oh well YOLO?

Play Young or Luai guys?