NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
Rabbits21- Fanatic
- Posts : 14035
Reputation : 6180
Join date : 2019-07-24
- Post n°641
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
Just throwing it out there, last 3 matches Haas has played against Souths he’s scored 51, 52 and 57.
filthridden- Moderator
- Posts : 19241
Reputation : 12118
Join date : 2015-09-27
- Post n°642
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
MilfordTheMagician wrote:Seems like Randall will be fine to play this week according to Barry Toohey, assuming he passes all HIA protocols.
I am assuming Best probably won't be.
Will have to cover him with Averillo although I am not convinced he'll score well against the Storm :/
KingTeddy- Posts : 953
Reputation : 293
Join date : 2020-01-20
- Post n°643
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
Rabbits21 wrote:Just throwing it out there, last 3 matches Haas has played against Souths he’s scored 51, 52 and 57.
Much different pack this year. Surely he can dominate it.
Rabbits21- Fanatic
- Posts : 14035
Reputation : 6180
Join date : 2019-07-24
- Post n°644
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
He got 52 in 80mins against us in round 2.KingTeddy wrote:
Much different pack this year. Surely he can dominate it.
Adrianoooo- Posts : 1497
Reputation : 498
Join date : 2018-03-19
- Post n°645
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
How were people getting the numbers for how many people in the top 100 or whatever own a certain player?
filthridden- Moderator
- Posts : 19241
Reputation : 12118
Join date : 2015-09-27
- Post n°646
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
KingTeddy wrote:
Much different pack this year. Surely he can dominate it.
One of those scores was from earlier this year. Played 80mins and still well under his normal tackle count. Nothing else sticking out at me from a quick glance.
I don't remember the game but were Souths attacking the edges more or was Haas being conserved because of the 80min expectation?
Guest- Guest
- Post n°647
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
filthridden wrote:
I am assuming Best probably won't be.
Will have to cover him with Averillo although I am not convinced he'll score well against the Storm :/
Yea, doesn't sound good for best.
https://twitter.com/nrlphysio/status/1289894878533447683?s=19
Guest- Guest
- Post n°648
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
Just change the number for what you're after.Adrianoooo wrote:How were people getting the numbers for how many people in the top 100 or whatever own a certain player?
https://footystatistics.com/ownership.php?teams=1000
Milchcow- Moderator
- Posts : 25406
Reputation : 17830
Join date : 2015-07-31
- Post n°649
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
Adrianoooo wrote:How were people getting the numbers for how many people in the top 100 or whatever own a certain player?
https://footystatistics.com/ownership.php?teams=100
Should be for last round, don't think it gives up-to-the-minute stats
DarkKnight- Posts : 1512
Reputation : 1419
Join date : 2015-10-02
- Post n°650
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
Rabbits21 wrote:
Awesome mate killing it.
How many trades left?
Cheers, 8 & $200k in the piggy bank.
One trade option is Crichton to Aub and Fogarty to Bateman.
danseels1985- Posts : 3592
Reputation : 1367
Join date : 2017-02-21
- Post n°651
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
Feel like I might have to use a trade and swap out CS9 for Tolo,not sure I can afford to have 2-3 weeks of playing both Sironen and Randall in my 17
Snatchpato- Posts : 9123
Reputation : 7789
Join date : 2020-06-28
Age : 33
Location : Gold Coast
- Post n°652
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
With 9 trades you will roar home mate. Great stuff.Dttragic2016 wrote:Score of 989 and rank of 3300 now.
Got 9 trades left really hoping there's carnage late in the season and I can creep into the top 1000!
Trades are like gold atm
Cool Runnings- Posts : 151
Reputation : 82
Join date : 2019-03-03
Location : NZ
- Post n°653
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
Last week Macca and Matterson
This week Smith and Randall. I reckon that’s about 150-200 points lost!
Can’t take a break - ranking from around 300 to 900 now so not all bad but pretty annoying!
This week Smith and Randall. I reckon that’s about 150-200 points lost!
Can’t take a break - ranking from around 300 to 900 now so not all bad but pretty annoying!
Liverpool_Bulldog- Fanatic
- Posts : 19477
Reputation : 6801
Join date : 2016-02-14
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°654
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
If I’m replacing Norman this week with another half, are Moses and Munster the best options for the rest of the season? Wighton could be considered as well perhaps
DCE and Hunt locked in already
DCE and Hunt locked in already
multiple.scoregasms- Fanatic
- Posts : 10288
Reputation : 7861
Join date : 2015-10-29
Age : 31
- Post n°655
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:If I’m replacing Norman this week with another half, are Moses and Munster the best options for the rest of the season? Wighton could be considered as well perhaps
DCE and Hunt locked in already
In terms of value for money Moses and Munster are just about the best options regardless of position. Probably don't score as much as DCE/Cleary the rest of the way, but should come close enough that the difference in cash will help
Liverpool_Bulldog- Fanatic
- Posts : 19477
Reputation : 6801
Join date : 2016-02-14
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°656
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
multiple.scoregasms wrote:
In terms of value for money Moses and Munster are just about the best options regardless of position. Probably don't score as much as DCE/Cleary the rest of the way, but should come close enough that the difference in cash will help
Yeah that’s where I’m at as far as value with those two.
One of them comes in but choosing which one will be tough. Would be nice if Munster gets a good buffer over the next 2-3 weeks without Smith (Goals and extra KM)
multiple.scoregasms- Fanatic
- Posts : 10288
Reputation : 7861
Join date : 2015-10-29
Age : 31
- Post n°657
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
Cookie Monster wrote:
I don't think I've ever read a more monstrous post in the time that I've been here. It almost made me hand out my first down vote ever, but as someone has already done that I'll let it go this time.
Be better MS
wolfking wrote:
LOL @ this getting downvoted.
Yeah, true. Maybe I have blinkers on, but it's looking like Cleary is the fantasy killer this year.
Chewie wrote:I want every big name gun... especially those capable of centuries
I've got McInnes, Haas, DCE, and Cleary. And I was lucky to get Lucy's century a few weeks back.
I really want Bateman as the POD pick, but I think i'll need to settle on DFifita (the popular pick)
I'm also thinking of parking the C on Cleary for the next little while with how he's playing.
Guess I was wrong lads, best course of action is to sideways trade your guns to another gun that just posted the top score of the round.
On a serious note having players that can give you a huge base with attacking upside is the best way to pick guns IMO.
Cleary/DCE/Moses/SJ all dominate their teams general play kicking, all bar DCE kick goals and all are heavily involved in attacking sets. Based purely on this role you will rarely see a 30, most weeks will be a 50+ and add in some attacking stats for some monsters
The hookers are similar in this regardless, although less likely to get bulk attacking stats. Cook, McInnes, Smith, Grant will give you a low of 40 purely through tackles. Add in the occasion attacking stats and most scores will be between 50 and 60
Then you have the forwards. Haas is good for 100 metres and 40 tackles every single week plus he rarely misses tackles so doesn't rack up negatives. Will always have a solid base. Taumalolo seems to pump out 200 metre games at will, throw in 30 tackles and you get a 50 base. Bateman is an interesting option because his points don't seem to heavily follow a pattern. Some weeks he will pump out 40 tackles, some weeks 8+ tbs, some weeks 4 offloads, the occasional try. But regardless of how he does it he always seems to score points relatively quickly
wolfking- Fanatics Immortal
- Posts : 34157
Reputation : 14195
Join date : 2016-04-26
Age : 40
Location : Brisbane
- Post n°658
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
That's why I have to bite the bullet and pay the money for Cleary. His base is massive and attack opportunities as we see is out of this world.
BCT05- Posts : 5521
Reputation : 2467
Join date : 2020-03-19
- Post n°659
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
WT2K wrote:
Yea, doesn't sound good for best.
https://twitter.com/nrlphysio/status/1289894878533447683?s=19
Another centre down
At least Herbie should be getting DPP this week
Milchcow- Moderator
- Posts : 25406
Reputation : 17830
Join date : 2015-07-31
- Post n°660
Re: NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 70 - Low-max
Luke Thompson has cracked 50 2 weeks in a row, and will still be under $600k.
I continue to think he is a good value 17th man for those who can't afford more
» NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 89 - Finals Fantasy 2020 End of Days
» NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 45 - Repent Your Fantasy Sins! Armageddon is upon us!
» NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 88 - Finals Fantasy brought to you by the letters M T V & B
» NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 65 - 60 Minutes, Fantasy edition
» NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 86 - Fantasy is a 15 man game
» NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 45 - Repent Your Fantasy Sins! Armageddon is upon us!
» NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 88 - Finals Fantasy brought to you by the letters M T V & B
» NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 65 - 60 Minutes, Fantasy edition
» NRL Fantasy 2020 Part 86 - Fantasy is a 15 man game