Who was this?Your Name wrote:People have changed. As the pay packets have increased the expectations on these guys have too. Right or wrong.
Have the people providing the pay packet put in the measures equivalent to meet this ? My company is responsible to provide me the tools, training and experience to do my job. Are the clubs doing this ?
An argument for the negative could be mounted based on the number of players who hit the headline for all the wrong reasons. Because if you include role model as part of the job description then they definitely fall short.
The players are expendable, do the minimum to cover any legal requirements and the players are treated as less than assets like you and I. Because assets can return a tax break through depreciation.
I will hark back to one of the biggest miscarriage of justices in my book:
Young gun goes away on a trial game
Shit goes down he wasn't involved in
Kid has to attend interrogation
Kid is cleared
Club tells kid don't get yourself involved in this kind of behavior
Kid gets selected for origin
Kid bangs a hooker to celebrate
Media report him coming out of a brothel
Kid gets dropped from origin
Who fucked up ? The kid, the club or the media ?
I can't see anything wrong with any of that except the media for reporting a non story, I've also said plenty of times that I think the NRL should licence journalists who report on the game.
Saying that the Pearce thing is a different story though, he's been educated about what not to do and should have known better especially if the club was handing out cabcharge vouchers to get home after the cruise. If that's not a hint I don't know what is.