NRL Fantasy 2021 Part 35 - Cheers, Slug

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:

Thank god I’ve got golfing talent!

Not putting from the rough ?

Revraiser wrote:

Not putting from the rough ?

I’ve dabbled

my tv broke wrote:

Can you pick on someone else he owns. I grabbed Tino last week too

Great minds

Mans just pulled $42 out of $12 worth of scratchies from my birthday!!! Winning.

Might have to have a punt tonight, old school style using the TAB

I think the fact that none of this years cows have been hit and miss WFB/CTRs (Laurie has been good) has made the start of the season quite a bit easier than past seasons

Milchcow wrote:


Its not an incredibly useful stat, because several years ago the salary cap was only $4million, and even guns cost less than shitty bench players can cost nowadays. they've also been adding scoring categories over the years so scores are creeping higher too.

I remember the primitive Fantasy NRL being players only got points for actually scoring points, plus 2 points for being on the winning team. It was a simpler time. I captained Campese when he scored 38 points, probably my greatest fantasy sports moment.

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:I think the fact that none of this years cows have been hit and miss WFB/CTRs (Laurie has been good) has made the start of the season quite a bit easier than past seasons

When I watched the Eels v Dragons on Sunday Sivo & Ravalawa were marking each other & I thought I remember when they both came on the scene in the same year & how they were both great cows & I had both in round 1 due to the Radradra effect meaning the Fijian connection so both will go boom & boy did they go boom.

White Lightning wrote:

When I watched the Eels v Dragons on Sunday Sivo & Ravalawa were marking each other & I thought I remember when they both came on the scene in the same year & how they were both great cows & I had both in round 1 due to the Radradra effect meaning the Fijian connection so both will go boom & boy did they go boom.

Did Rava start slightly slower that year?

Hopefully I can save a trade tonight if Walker goes 40+ because I have Liddle at 17 & Walker at 18. This also requires Liddle not playing. If Walker doesn't score so great &/or Liddle is named in the 17 then I will use my 2nd trade.

@Revraiser you purchased your Hampton ticket this year ????

Last bench spot conundrum:

TU: SWalker
TD: Egan

Shit I forgot with Leniu being a spud, I'll need to play Walker. Not confident but you never know. Also means I definitely have to trade Liddle not to cop Lenius 18 haha.

ShadowSabre wrote:Last bench spot conundrum:

TU: SWalker
TD: Egan

This is a conundrum??

ShadowSabre wrote:Last bench spot conundrum:

TU: SWalker
TD: Egan

You forgot to put the obvious option as TU for the extra karma

ShadowSabre wrote:Last bench spot conundrum:

TU: SWalker
TD: Egan

Egan is my vote.

Aardvark Ratnick wrote:@Revraiser you purchased your Hampton ticket this year ????

I havent mate, that noe time a few years ago it felt right and paid off, but this time feels so different. Not established as the half, Clifford, Hampton could be in another position next week or left right out.. cowboys.. i can't do it. And thats even when i need a centre this week, as i started the season with Averillo/Niu/Momo and traded out Avo a week or two back. This week i have brought in Ramien for a set and forget.

How about u ? I have no problems with a trade or two in the centre position due to injury etc. I have brought Lucy in this week also, which could be reverted and here comes Hampton, as next week i will have Momo issues as well. But i say no to that.

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:

Thank god I’ve got golfing talent!

Wait, I thought Slug was Rabs.
How many alts can a bloke have.

I'm projecting Cleary to hit ~$1,110,000 this year (should be close to a $50k rise).

And yes, that is easily the highest ticket price a player has hit, but probably still short of what he'd fetch on the open market if he were available to all NRL clubs.

wolfking wrote:

This is a conundrum??

I was gonna write the same thing, single question mark though

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:

I was gonna write the same thing, single question mark though

The extra question mark accents the absurdness of the two options.