Mulvy wrote:
You left that there, just to annoy people right? Right?
Must ignore it. Must ignore....
I’ll go back and fix my ‘you’re’ so you can go to bed
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Mulvy wrote:
You left that there, just to annoy people right? Right?
Must ignore it. Must ignore....
mrbrownstone wrote:573/8(C) & lost 700 ranks.
Crichton, Teddy, Walker in the 17 not ideal & Molyan, Leniu on the EMG ensure some fires to put out.
Hopefully PODgarty & Moses at 3 and 6% ownership help tomorrow.
Mr Snrub wrote:
Moylan is a real slow burner but he does cover WFB for me so I might as well keep him.
Mulvy wrote:Get Simpkins in so he can score a try on debut for 57 points - pending
Revraiser wrote:Pass me a lamington dude.
WT Winfield wrote:
Expecting a lot of demerits mate?
WT Winfield wrote:
Haha, they didn't last long mate My mate owns the local bakery so I have a hand in whipping those bad boys up at times and score a tray for my efforts
Mulvy wrote:
Imagine this is a Fry meme from Futurama:
Unsure if serious question or just making fun of Simpkins v Simpkin
WT Winfield wrote:
Oh shit I didn't even notice the 's' that time
I reckon Simpkin 70+ if it includes a try
Ramitinmyhaaas wrote:Could've sworn Walker broke 2 tackles in like the last few minutes of the game. Oh well still would've been like a 30.
surmo13 wrote:
If you’re talking about the play I think you are, it was a dead play because of the offside penalty.
Khany wrote:The interest in FOG. Was it mainly due to bye coverage or being under priced ?