Milchcow wrote:
For someone without Walsh or Hynes, Walsh is the smarter play right?
Cheaper, and with better job security
I'd say so. I've got Walsh already, but I could totally see him finding a spot all year, he already has, and as you say he's cheaper. Hynes could play all year too but probably has an expiration date. I'm strongly considering bringing him in, but probably Walsh if I had to choose.
Last edited by Mulvy on Tue May 25, 2021 10:56 pm; edited 1 time in total