Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
Round 15 and 17 are 4 trade weeks
Round 14 and 16 are 2 trade weeks
Oof, okay that may change things.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
Round 15 and 17 are 4 trade weeks
Round 14 and 16 are 2 trade weeks
Rabbits21 wrote:
This could be the Knights pack though come round 15 when Klemmer is back Jones might only be good for 2 weeks.... eg:
Klemmer
Brailey
D. Saifiti
Barnett
Fitzgibbon
Sue
Watson
J. Saifiti
Jones
........
wolfking wrote:
AOB I think has shown his hand and prefers Barnett at lock.
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:I gotta bad feeling about the weight of expectation we are piling on young Brodie
easytiger wrote:
The group-think is running strong today.
FWIW I totally agree with Rabbits21 on this one.
Barnett literally moved to Lock when Fitzgibbon became available - there is nothing to suggest the shift would've happened had Fitzgibbon not been available.
I'd suggest the move was more about AOB liking Fitzgibbon on the edge and Barnett being very capable of playing Lock.
Sue at 13, is really Sue playing 20 minutes to absorb contact and energy in the middle at the start before Watson comes on and plays out the game at Lock.
Don't be surprised if Jones quickly goes back to 20-30 minute stints for 9-17 points (and the occasional 30 point effort).
my tv broke wrote:
Walker, 345K
for me, i think
easytiger wrote:
The group-think is running strong today.
FWIW I totally agree with Rabbits21 on this one.
Barnett literally moved to Lock when Fitzgibbon became available - there is nothing to suggest the shift would've happened had Fitzgibbon not been available.
I'd suggest the move was more about AOB liking Fitzgibbon on the edge and Barnett being very capable of playing Lock.
Sue at 13, is really Sue playing 20 minutes to absorb contact and energy in the middle at the start before Watson comes on and plays out the game at Lock.
Don't be surprised if Jones quickly goes back to 20-30 minute stints for 9-17 points (and the occasional 30 point effort).
StormTrooper96 wrote:Those talking about 4 trade rounds - This is a warning on my fantasy page
Trade Info
A maximum of two trades can be made simultaneously, so making more than two trades in R13 or R17 is a two-step process.
See seems as though only R13 and 17 are 4 trade weeks
wolfking wrote:Fair call. I think more importantly we're getting to the point where there's a good chance who you bring in, especially a cheapie that they may sit in your team all year. At best you want a player with some sort of job security. At least Jones regardless of where he'll end up seemingly has secured a bench role and should be in the 17 all week. I won't get him at this stage but based on what we have available, he's a solid option.
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:I gotta bad feeling about the weight of expectation we are piling on young Brodie
my tv broke wrote:
its definitely a gamble, but its an appealing gamble (233k starting edge player).
When Fitz went off for a HIA last week, Jones went to edge (barnett kept playing middle).
Think Jones probably gets around 60-65 mins anyway.
This week they probably need Barnett in the middle because Klem/DSAF are out.. but yeah, what happens when they are back. Pearce not far off either.
It does seem a bit "fantasy goggles" to suggest Jones will start until Friz is back.
toast wrote:
Has anyone looked at his chin yet?
wolfking wrote:
Fair call. I think more importantly we're getting to the point where there's a good chance who you bring in, especially a cheapie that they may sit in your team all year. At best you want a player with some sort of job security. At least Jones regardless of where he'll end up seemingly has secured a bench role and should be in the 17 all week. I won't get him at this stage but based on what we have available, he's a solid option.
Mr Snrub wrote:See the dilemma for me is I wouldn't mind trading in Jones but when my WFB is Walsh, Turbo and Teddy, that's potentially 3 not playing Round 14 so I think I'm better served trading in a WFB so I can field 17. Hynes and Laurie can fill in two WFB spots.
easytiger wrote:
That's fair too.
It's a bit like Tyronne May. Some immediate upside and who know's what extra opportunities may present.
But like May, the "downside" is still he gets regular bench time for some amount of points if you find yourself needing them.
Mulvy wrote:
What did I miss on Walsh? Is he in doubt for rd14?
Mulvy wrote:
What did I miss on Walsh? Is he in doubt for rd14?