NRL Fantasy 2021 Part 62 - Friday Afternoon Procrastination

Milchcow wrote:
At 43/2 I have dropped over 6000 ranks.

214 to be added from NPRs tomorrow and 5 players in action, including (c) Brailey

241/5(C). Dropped about 2100 ranks from last week but have 174 points in EMG to come in and 5 players also in play tomorrow.

Kelly just needed to pass the ball and we would have been 50/50 to win. Also that pass from Sami was way too hard. Marsters was never catching that.

Rank still pretty much unchanged. Does six tomorrow counteract the bench wankers? (yep wankers has to be the correct grammar for one who participates in wankery, no?)

Mulvy wrote:Rank still pretty much unchanged. Does six tomorrow counteract the bench wankers? (yep wankers has to be the correct grammar for one who participates in wankery, no?)

Yes, I am indeed a wanker.

"I knew if I didnt put my body on the line my girlfriend would kill me"

So weird seeing guys like him and Walker who look like children playing the game.

FalconSloth wrote:Kelly just needed to pass the ball and we would have been 50/50 to win. Also that pass from Sami was way too hard. Marsters was never catching that.

Kelly bombed several. It's like that edge hasn't seen any ball all year due to a monster inside them shutting the plays down by scoring tries...

wolfking wrote:

241/5(C).  Dropped about 2100 ranks from last week but have 174 points in EMG to come in and 5 players also in play tomorrow.

6/357c lost about 200 spots. + 172 in npr to be added. Moses, Watson and Brailey to come.

wolfking wrote:

Yes, I am indeed a wanker.

Am a wanker too

Mulvy wrote:Rank still pretty much unchanged. Does six tomorrow counteract the bench wankers? (yep wankers has to be the correct grammar for one who participates in wankery, no?)

I reckon the "bench wankers" comprise about a dozen people, almost all of them on here, so doubt it'll impact ranks for regulation players too much.

Going fog over cheese was a bad call by the new mrs fortitude. Awful awful advise.

Mulvy wrote:Rank still pretty much unchanged. Does six tomorrow counteract the bench wankers? (yep wankers has to be the correct grammar for one who participates in wankery, no?)

Yeah same, rank didn't move much , 6 tomorrow without wankery.
I don't believe there will be a significant amount of benchwankers.

Only saw the last 10 mins. Unreal seeing Marsters throw a ball 2m forward to Sami, only for Sami to one-up him on the final play with a pass 2m forward and completely uncatchable.

Also I know players have been staying down for penalties, but usually they are legit hit in the head when they do it. Peachey may be the first not to worry about that detail. But refs - especially the video ref - has to be better than that.

Only had Fogarty there, so went backwards, but not as far as was expecting

Mulvy wrote:Rank still pretty much unchanged. Does six tomorrow counteract the bench wankers? (yep wankers has to be the correct grammar for one who participates in wankery, no?)

Expect so, the only really fantasy relevant players by ownership are Moses, iPap, Brailey, Watson, Mahoney, so I would expect having 6 is more than 99% of teams.

485/9c
Rank from 11,222 to 7,501 (+3,721)

Still to play: Brailey, Watson, Jones, Papali'i, Matterson

rhinoceroo wrote:

I reckon the "bench wankers" comprise about a dozen people, almost all of them on here, so doubt it'll impact ranks for regulation players too much.

Yep there’s never as many AEs/loops as you’d think. Won’t be that many involved in bench wankery.

386/8 (C)

Hynes could have been a lot worse. An update to 50 would look nicer. Kelly is a centre, I guess. Fog is a pain, too many 30s for my liking.

Up about 700 ranks so far to 4600.

Matto, Moses, iPap, Watson, Brailey, Jones in play tomorrow. Hope that's enough to sneak up to 3000ish.

Chewie wrote:
Yeah same, rank didn't move much , 6 tomorrow without wankery.
I don't believe there will be a significant amount of benchwankers.

Dirty old men in Trenchcoats ( I keep hearing Jethro Tulls Aqualung in my head ) for those old enough.

robelgordo wrote:

Yep there’s never as many AEs/loops as you’d think. Won’t be that many involved in bench wankery.

Shouldn’t affect us up the top of the ladder....

rhinoceroo wrote:

I reckon the "bench wankers" comprise about a dozen people, almost all of them on here, so doubt it'll impact ranks for regulation players too much.

We are a secret society. Not everyone can join.