NRL Fantasy 2021 Part 70 - Origin, Bye & lock downs

mattnz wrote:

That diagram is terrible, if you are creating a flow diagram to make decisions, you don't include key information outside of the decision flow, it needs to be included in the decision flow somewhere, not as a note outside of it.

Sure, don't disagree at all. Yet I, a stupid qlder, managed to see it. Really makes you wonder...

Regulator wrote:Lol a little less sympathy now

That claim is despite Mulitalo telling News Corp today that he had arrived as a 13-year-old, while he was also quoted in a 2016 article claiming he was a "NSW boy" but would represent Queensland at a junior level "as a favour" to his mother.
Just read an article from 2016, about Mulitalo making a QLD secondary school’s opens team.



Despite being a self- confessed NSW supporter, Ronaldo said he wouldn’t have any second thoughts about pulling on the Queensland jersey.

“I told mum I would do it for her,” he laughed.

“I’m a NSW boy but I told her I would do it as a favour.”

Did you click the link i shared with you that literally tells you his is eligible on the NRL's own site?

Archer wrote:
Did you click the link i shared with you that literally tells you his is eligible on the NRL's own site?

The one you're interpreting wrong? No I didn't.

Can feel another 40+ to the Blues tonight. This isn't going to be pretty.

my tv broke wrote:

The fantasy goggles are strong on this one

Name another edge that has made the impact that Fifita has on their NRL team this season.

Just no HIA's to ruin it

Regulator wrote:

The one you're interpreting wrong? No I didn't.

So how do you interpret the bit that says "It is important to note if you have played Origin at U18, U20 or Senior Origin, your State of eligibility is confirmed. These new rules are applicable from December 2012.". It's the bit in black and yellow so I can understand it not being black and white enough for you.

Alright. I have the lucky maroon socks on tonight. Forgot them for game 1.
That might buy us a closer game

wolfking wrote:Can feel another 40+ to the Blues tonight.  This isn't going to be pretty.

Think QLD might pull out a more competitive performance here, my prediction is NSW by 12 or so

Archer wrote:
So how do you interpret the bit that says "It is important to note if you have played Origin at U18, U20 or Senior Origin, your State of eligibility is confirmed. These new rules are applicable from December 2012.". It's the bit in black and yellow so I can understand it not being black and white enough for you.

Note that if says state eligibility, not state of origin eligibility.

For your state eligibility to be determined, you need to firstly be eligible to play. Which he isn't. If you meet the eligibility to play, then your state eligibility is determined.

It's pretty obvious this is to clarify for existing players prior to the rule change, hence why they specify senior Origin as well. They weren't going to be like oh you played for Queensland last year but now you play for NSW. Pretty basic grandfather clause. It also addressed scenarios like Thurston playing junior NSW then going to Queensland.

By your logic SBW should have been playing for NSW for years. But of course, he didn't. Because he wasn't eligible to play.

Regulator wrote:

Note that if says state eligibility, not state of origin eligibility.

For your state eligibility to be determined, you need to firstly be eligible to play. Which he isn't. If you meet the eligibility to play, then your state eligibility is determined.

It's pretty obvious this is to clarify for existing players prior to the rule change, hence why they specify senior Origin as well. They weren't going to be like oh you played for Queensland last year but now you play for NSW. Pretty basic grandfather clause. It also addressed scenarios like Thurston playing junior NSW then going to Queensland.

If you're eligible to play for a state that means you're eligible to play for that state. You can only do so in the NRL, during the state of origin. He can't be both eligible and ineligible. You can say something is obvious all you want, but unlike the rule I've quoted there is no mention anywhere that it only applies to those scenarios when it would have been simple enough to do so. I dunno, seems like a grey area to me

mattnz wrote:
Name another edge that has made the impact that Fifita has on their NRL team this season.

The titans are 13th

Archer wrote:
If you're eligible to play for a state that means you're eligible to play for that state. You can only do so in the NRL, during the state of origin. He can't be both eligible and intelligible. You can say something is obvious all you want, but unlike the rule I've quoted there is no mention anywhere that it only applies to those scenarios when it would have been simple enough to do so. I dunno, seems like a grey area to me

He isn't both eligible and ineligible. He's ineligible. Not there before 13. Not eligible.

The only people confused on that clause are upset Queenslanders.

Note how that doc is called state of origin eligibility, and that section refers to state eligibility. Words are important.

Note how JT is talking about getting proof of when he arrived in Australia to prove his eligibility.

Don't worry, your best forward is a Kiwi anyway.

TRELL

OK guys let's move on from this, clearly you're not going to agree with each other on this one.

Back to the game.

filthridden wrote:OK guys let's move on from this, clearly you're not going to agree with each other on this one.

Back to the game.

Yes dad, but until someone gets binned or sent off vlandysball doesn't start anyway

Fight at 37th minute its on

Motm performance so far from Latrell

Inspiration to all of us keg carriers

Operation gas Mitchell is a success, the ol rope a dope. Now we run everything that side, totally part of the plan