NRL Fantasy 2021 Part 85 - Creedence Cleary Revival

Weiland wrote:

Ash Taylor probably won't be there next year.

Fog and Sexton are similar players are they not?

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:

Why would you sign a 2 year extension if your Fog? Seems like he might not be the smartest cookie in the jar

The pecking order can change anytime with opportunities. If he had given up that easily and that too to a rookie then the coach would have been worried.

sajjos wrote:

The pecking order can change anytime with opportunities. If he had given up that easily and that too to a rookie then the coach would have been worried.

If the coach isn’t going to back you then I don’t think he’d mind a hell of a lot if you don’t sign an extension

The Bunnies will rout the Titans, and Sexton will be found wanting.

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:

Why would you sign a 2 year extension if your Fog? Seems like he might not be the smartest cookie in the jar

He just said while he's playing well and they are winning he's not changing a winning formula.

my tv broke wrote:

Fog isnt a young fella. He got an unexpected opportunity with the Titans (when holbrook picked him from q cup) and grabbed it with both hands. Reckon he is happy living the coast life and would be comfortable to lock in two more seasons there. Good on him.

Sexton is their future, Fog is basically in Benjis position now. Older head. Good backup half

Put out to pasture @ 27. Poor guy lol

Upset today. Go the Tits !

Revraiser wrote:Upset today. Go the Tits !

Yes boobies

Mitchell banner incoming

WT2K wrote:Mitchell banner incoming

Moses, Pearce or Barnett?

I reckon about one in three of Cook's left-to-right passes are forward.

Fifita on shortly, tries about to reign in !

Revraiser wrote:Fifita on shortly, tries about to reign in !

Too little too late

Referees fault for not calling held if he was held

Rabbits21 wrote:

I bloody hope so.

Just re the explanation from the MRC it sounds like they’re saying soft shoulder charges are ok now!

I just am a bit confused.

I mean it had enough force to dislodge the ball.

The explanation kinda makes sense but it makes it very subjective and just open to controversy. They’d be better just saying all shoulder charges are penalties… like everyone thought. Just that some don’t warrant a trip to the judiciary beyond that.

Simple game and every time they add shades of gray to rules its not better

They have removed Sexton's TS on Arrow, better get that one right

How am I supposed to believe Cook won beach sprints after seeing him lose that contest to the charged down ball?