NRL Fantasy 2021 Part 87 - Fifita is a bust edition

Scorers love down dating Hynes, let see what they do this week.

Gotta make a decision who sits out for Peach.  Verrills, Trindall, Burton, Blore, Manu, Watson.  Heaps of options.  Probably Verrills but Burton could easily have a dud game. Takes my WFB cover away though.

Munsters on a real tear since I decided on Pearce over him a couple of weeks ago.
The rationale was that Munster might get a rest……Pearce is going to have to break Cleary’s record the week Munster does get that rest. I’m quietly confident…

Khany wrote:Scorers love down dating Hynes, let see what they do this week.

I would also be down for dating Hynes.

wolfking wrote:Gotta make a decision who sits out for Peach.  Verrills, Trindall, Burton, Blore, Manu, Watson.  Heaps of options.  Probably Verrills but Burton could easily have a dud game.  Takes my WFB cover away though.

Verrills for mine, least likely if those to beat 48. I'd gamble on Burton's ceiling personally

Well I’ve got Peachey in the loop via Macca. I think I’ll take the 48 from Peachey.

Now the question is I do just run with the scores of Doueihi, Walsh, Verrills and Peachey for my interchange......

Or do I trade Macca to Curran as my last trade and run with scores of Doueihi, Walsh, Curran and Peachey....

I’m thinking Verrills scores around 35 so if Curran scores around 60 which I think he will that’s only 25 points more it’s probs not worth the trade.

Maybe I’ll just hold my last trade as long as I can as there could be quite a few restings come round 25 and that’s when I could use that golden last trade.

Thoughts guys?

Yeah holding the trade and playing Verrills sounds good mate. The trade could be worth more next week or the final round. Even if Curran outscored Verrills by 50, you could make that back and then some with a few restings.

WT Winfield wrote:Yeah holding the trade and playing Verrills sounds good mate. The trade could be worth more next week or the final round. Even if Curran outscored Verrills by 50, you could make that back and then some with a few restings.

Thanks mate. I was just going through the FOG ladder and sadly there are lots of cooked teams running on fumes, it’s been that kinda year!

Does anyone have the captaincy percentages for the round? I’d be keen to know what they are......

Fog 57
Tino 39
Fifita 30
Peachey 53

Pap 63
Reimis 37
Munster 83
Hynes 39
Grant 93

Hmmm wasn’t expecting a score like that from Foggy.

Had him in the loop with Walsh, would you bring Walsh in for any of Moses or Brailey?

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Hmmm wasn’t expecting a score like that from Foggy.

Had him in the loop with Walsh, would you bring Walsh in for any of Moses or Brailey?

Ranking them in order i'd go:

Moses, Walsh, Brailey

bigbruno wrote:

Ranking them in order i'd go:

Moses, Walsh, Brailey

Cheers mate. Interesting lil scenario to mull over today at least

hehe, fifita. 1.2 million. silly titans.

243/4

Nice little start with Grant, Papy, Fog and Fifita

Last 2 weeks for Fifita is precisely why I didn't start the year with him. Has a stinker in him when he just doesn't care

On the game Melbourne really missed Smith in the opening 20. He isn't the most technically sound defender but he throws 110% into every tackle which wins a lot of rucks. Grant is incredible but has probably scored too many points in the run home and ruined his price for next year. I remember throwing his name around when everyone was on the DCE bandwagon after his 119 in round 19 but didn't personally have the trades to grab him

Captain for Top 1k > 1%:
Cleary: 46.7%
Haas: 11.6%
Tedesco: 11.3%
DCE: 10.8%
Doueihi: 8.3%
Grant: 1.9%
Fifita: 1.2%

God I need an exceptional week this week

ynot wrote:Captain for Top 1k > 1%:
Cleary: 46.7%
Haas: 11.6%
Tedesco: 11.3%
DCE: 10.8%
Doueihi: 8.3%
Grant: 1.9%
Fifita: 1.2%

The Fifita captainers have certainly had their weekend ruined nice and early.

wolfking wrote:

The Fifita captainers have certainly had their weekend ruined nice and early.

I certainly thought I was clever not advertising my intention here.