NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Stop! Banner Time

NSW Police are investigating the Haas incident, as he is on a good behaviour bond

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/nrl-2022-transfer-whispers-manly-sea-eagles-stephen-humphreys-chief-executive-son-signings-contracts-sydney-roosters-ronald-volkman-luke-keary-sam-walker-highlights/news-story/c6b5cd287d43e30d9c39d8fc8b40a1af

rhinoceroo wrote:Teddy or TPJ or Latrell. Pick one. (Too long for a TU/TD)

Already have TPJ so be bias saying him.
Of the other two I'd go Teddy. Less lazy, better team

mattnz wrote:NSW Police are investigating the Haas incident, as he is on a good behaviour bond

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/nrl-2022-transfer-whispers-manly-sea-eagles-stephen-humphreys-chief-executive-son-signings-contracts-sydney-roosters-ronald-volkman-luke-keary-sam-walker-highlights/news-story/c6b5cd287d43e30d9c39d8fc8b40a1af

I must be blind because I don't see anything in that about a police investigation?
Edit. Yep I'm blind

Krump wrote:
I must be blind because I don't see anything in that about a police investigation?
Edit. Yep I'm blind

"The Broncos and NRL integrity unit are investigating it, as are the New South Wales Police given Haas is still on a good behaviour bond."

mattnz wrote:NSW Police are investigating the Haas incident, as he is on a good behaviour bond

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/nrl-2022-transfer-whispers-manly-sea-eagles-stephen-humphreys-chief-executive-son-signings-contracts-sydney-roosters-ronald-volkman-luke-keary-sam-walker-highlights/news-story/c6b5cd287d43e30d9c39d8fc8b40a1af

Wouldn't charges need to be pressed for the police to get involved in something so minute as this? Or does the good behaviour thing mean they can scrutinize every little thing he does?

Unless Matt is actually Commissioner of the NSW Police I can't see anything coming of this.

wolfking wrote:

Wouldn't charges need to be pressed for the police to get involved in something so minute as this?  Or does the good behaviour thing mean they can scrutinize every little thing he does?

Possibly more happened than what was filmed.

NRL is easily the most crazy/entertaining sport on this earth. On and off the field

wolfking wrote:

Wouldn't charges need to be pressed for the police to get involved in something so minute as this?  Or does the good behaviour thing mean they can scrutinize every little thing he does?

Unless they go for charges of affray against both Haas and Kelly, which is extremely unlikely, they would need a complaint made by Kelly, also highly unlikely.
That is going on the information we have available at this point.

You have to admit it would be kinda funny if Haas does cop a couple of weeks. The I told you so post will be legendary

If I didn’t start with Tuilagi would he be worth trading in? Hasn’t had the greatest start to the season but hopefully things start to look up?

mattnz wrote:NSW Police are investigating the Haas incident, as he is on a good behaviour bond

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/nrl-2022-transfer-whispers-manly-sea-eagles-stephen-humphreys-chief-executive-son-signings-contracts-sydney-roosters-ronald-volkman-luke-keary-sam-walker-highlights/news-story/c6b5cd287d43e30d9c39d8fc8b40a1af

My guess - NSW Police would've been asked by a journo and said "we are investigating" as a default response.

It's a brilliant use of police resources. What a joke

wolfking wrote:

Wouldn't charges need to be pressed for the police to get involved in something so minute as this?  Or does the good behaviour thing mean they can scrutinize every little thing he does?

Looks like he could be in for some serious shit, the threshold for breaching looks to be pretty low.... "require that you keep the peace and be of good behaviour."

-----------------------

Bonds under sections 30, 31 and 32
Good behaviour bonds in Queensland are issued under section 30 for indictable offences. If you are convicted on indictment the court may order that you be released on a bond (with or without sureties) for a specified period of time. This is in addition to, or instead of, any other sentence that the court imposes.

You will be imprisoned until you enter into the bond, although you cannot be held for longer than one year in these circumstances.

Section 31 bonds apply to summary offences. These bonds can only be imposed for a period of less than one year, and will require that you keep the peace and be of good behaviour.

Section 32 bonds can be imposed instead of any other penalty that is available to the court.

Breaching a recognisance
For all good behaviour bonds in Queensland, if the court is satisfied that you have failed to comply with a condition, the bond may be forfeited and a warrant issued for your arrest.

If a forfeiture order is made, you will lose any surety promised under the bond.

Under the warrant, you can be arrested at any time, bought back to court and re-sentenced

https://www.gotocourt.com.au/criminal-law/qld/good-behaviour-bonds/#:~:text=Good%20behaviour%20bonds%20in%20Queensland%20allow%20the%20courts%20to%20release,a%20set%20period%20of%20time.

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:If I didn’t start with Tuilagi would he be worth trading in? Hasn’t had the greatest start to the season but hopefully things start to look up?

He's been unlucky with injuries, has looked like value when he is playing

the_great_wobbler wrote:You have to admit it would be kinda funny if Haas does cop a couple of weeks. The I told you so post will be legendary

I have to admit, the thought crossed my mind.

rhinoceroo wrote:Just realised it's Burton vs Cleary this weekend on the same side of the field. Interesting, they should know each others' game. Doubt Penrith will get fooled by Burton's left foot step.

So Burton will give tips to Dogs team on playing Cleary

the_great_wobbler wrote:

He's been unlucky with injuries, has looked like value when he is playing

Yeah maybe I’ll grab Jones this week and then see how Tuilagi goes without an injury

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:If I didn’t start with Tuilagi would he be worth trading in? Hasn’t had the greatest start to the season but hopefully things start to look up?

Initially was thinking probably only if you need an EDG. But can average 35-ish if he ever finishes a game. Could still make 150k. I've talked myself round in those two sentences.

Outside of Koula, the next cheapest decent buy is James Roberts. I'm being serious.

mattnz wrote:

Looks like he could be in for some serious shit, the threshold for breaching looks to be pretty low.... "require that you keep the peace and be of good behaviour."

how are you still going with this. lol

mattnz wrote:

Looks like he could be in for some serious shit, the threshold for breaching looks to be pretty low.... "require that you keep the peace and be of good behaviour."

-----------------------

Bonds under sections 30, 31 and 32
Good behaviour bonds in Queensland are issued under section 30 for indictable offences. If you are convicted on indictment the court may order that you be released on a bond (with or without sureties) for a specified period of time. This is in addition to, or instead of, any other sentence that the court imposes.

You will be imprisoned until you enter into the bond, although you cannot be held for longer than one year in these circumstances.

Section 31 bonds apply to summary offences. These bonds can only be imposed for a period of less than one year, and will require that you keep the peace and be of good behaviour.

Section 32 bonds can be imposed instead of any other penalty that is available to the court.

Breaching a recognisance
For all good behaviour bonds in Queensland, if the court is satisfied that you have failed to comply with a condition, the bond may be forfeited and a warrant issued for your arrest.

If a forfeiture order is made, you will lose any surety promised under the bond.

Under the warrant, you can be arrested at any time, bought back to court and re-sentenced

https://www.gotocourt.com.au/criminal-law/qld/good-behaviour-bonds/#:~:text=Good%20behaviour%20bonds%20in%20Queensland%20allow%20the%20courts%20to%20release,a%20set%20period%20of%20time.

It's probably similar anyway, but it's the NSW police.