NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 34 - Nana Nana Nana Nana Nanai!

Finch wrote:

50 is a "bad" score for iPap, not trade out material, but you aren't paying that price for him to score 50.

Most of the time, most of us, if we're honest, hope that the players we don't own, score poorly. Most of us don't say it out loud most of the time, because it makes you sound like a douche. Most of us...

Queue the Road Warriors gifs as Rushton becomes our new favourite cow

Finch wrote:

50 is a "bad" score for iPap, not trade out material, but you aren't paying that price for him to score 50.

People did it for Cleary

Shady2K wrote:Moses would’ve been such the better pick up over Brown a few weeks ago. Ah well

Win some ya lose some mate, I picked up Dyl Brown too but ah well

Mulvy wrote:

Most of the time, most of us, if we're honest, hope that the players we don't own, score poorly. Most of us don't say it out loud most of the time, because it makes you sound like a douche. Most of us...

I'm very open

Finch wrote:

50 is a "bad" score for iPap, not trade out material, but you aren't paying that price for him to score 50.

Do you actually know how averages work Finch?

You are correct, you don’t pay for a 50, but you don’t pay for an 80 either. You pay for an inbetween.

What you need to do mate is add all the scores together and divide by the number of games they play. If you need any other maths help, give me a shout kid

Mulvy wrote:

Nice insight mate.

I don't think it will stick long term though more of a kick up the ass for Brown. If Eels want any chance at winning the comp Brown has to be at 6

If BroJo's arm is no good, I don't think Knights have an EDG to replace him in their squad

MF wrote:


Nah Mitch, Milch doesnt have a power trip in him.

Mitch was an annoying Broncos fan who barely posted on sportal at the end but came back form no where and reigned havoc for a couple of hours. I think it was Standard and Honeysett that had to unban everyone who he banned

Mulvy wrote:

Sounds like a challenge.

If I'm going down it's going to be a Rabbits like blaze of glory

**USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST**

First time owner/captainer of Cleary this year - I had to let iPap go to facilitate the move .... I'm sure it was the right move .... wasn't it?

rhinoceroo wrote:

Pack were battered today as well. Probably need to move Mann to the halves and get some more weight up there, kill two birds with one stone.

Hastings trading trigger finger certainly moving away from Nanai and towards Randall (although what else do they have at hooker, Crossland is even worse).

Yeah they did mate and it never helps but the halves do absolutely nothing but accept the ball and kick, no attempt to up the Tempo, they don’t attack the line.

It’s tough when you pack go backwards but the better players can manufacture something to change momentum.

Knights have a bevvy of below mediocre options and they are suffering because of it

Welshy wrote:

Do you actually know how averages work Finch?

You are correct, you don’t pay for a 50, but you don’t pay for an 80 either. You pay for an inbetween.

What you need to do mate is add all the scores together and divide by the number of games they play. If you need any other maths help, give me a shout kid

So 220K player, you're only buying him to score 20 points? Not a potential cash cow scoring 40/50/60?

Come on mate!

Ozymandias wrote:First time owner/captainer of Cleary this year - I had to let iPap go to facilitate the move .... I'm sure it was the right move .... wasn't it?

Evidently not

Finch wrote:

I'm very open

That's one word. Mine's better

mrbrownstone wrote:Little trend.

Weeks I've played Ilias in the 17 he's scored his three lowest scores: 20, 18, 18 for an average of 18.66

Weeks I've left Ilias on the bench he's scored his four highest scores: 21, 33, 43, and 36 for an average of 33.25.

Will let everyone know what I'm doing with him in advance next week so you can do the opposite.

If I know anything about averages, that means he should go 70+ if you play him next week.

Sidenote: Copped a headknock earlier so take that with a grain of salt

Finch wrote:

So 220K player, you're only buying him to score 20 points? Not a potential cash cow scoring 40/50/60?

Come on mate!

Guns and cows. Different scenario

The point is obvious.

But yes my cows do seem to score exactly where priced this season, but that’s not by choice

Anyway, game time.

Tago a sell if -40? Hmmmm

Welshy wrote:

Yeah they did mate and it never helps but the halves do absolutely nothing but accept the ball and kick, no attempt to up the Tempo, they don’t attack the line.

It’s tough when you pack go backwards but the better players can manufacture something to change momentum.

Knights have a bevvy of below mediocre options and they are suffering because of it

If you are getting battered in the middle good halves will normally get up on the advantage line and have the big boys run a little wider to slow the line speed of the defense. Halves are the reason Knights were in my bottom 4 preseason

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

If you are getting battered in the middle good halves will normally get up on the advantage line and have the big boys run a little wider to slow the line speed of the defense. Halves are the reason Knights were in my bottom 4 preseason

Post more.