NRL Fantasy Fanatics



Join the forum, it's quick and easy

NRL Fantasy Fanatics

NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    my tv broke
    my tv broke
    Fanatics Immortal

    Posts : 28342
    Reputation : 20985
    Join date : 2016-01-08

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by my tv broke Tue May 10, 2022 6:09 pm

    Was thinking it was generally backs that took a while to gwt up to speed after acl return and PYTM seemed to have confirmed that.

    Simon Templar
    Simon Templar

    Posts : 1790
    Reputation : 1039
    Join date : 2016-02-05

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by Simon Templar Tue May 10, 2022 6:09 pm


    Does anyone know what's going on with Brodie Jones? The casualty ward on NRL.com says "elbow, Round 10), but he hasn't been selected in a 24-man squad for this week.
    AL
    AL

    Posts : 1592
    Reputation : 1888
    Join date : 2016-01-10

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by AL Tue May 10, 2022 6:10 pm

    mattnz wrote:How did Kennedy possibly get a week's less suspension than Ramien? Was a far worse tackle.

    I’m confused (doesn’t take much).

    Are you saying Kennedy’s tackle was ‘much worse’ than Ramien’s, or vice versa?
    Loomer
    Loomer
    Fanatic

    Posts : 10737
    Reputation : 4327
    Join date : 2016-01-29

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by Loomer Tue May 10, 2022 6:11 pm

    Davey back killing my loop lol. A questionable R13 player though. I shouldn't complain. Is Kodi going to steal minutes from Cook? Who else does he take minutes off from?
    WT Winfield
    WT Winfield

    Posts : 9630
    Reputation : 6982
    Join date : 2016-08-21

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by WT Winfield Tue May 10, 2022 6:11 pm

    mattnz wrote:How did Kennedy possibly get a week's less suspension than Ramien? Was a far worse tackle.

    Both Grade 3 Careless. First offence for Kennedy, while Ramien has priors.
    Loomer
    Loomer
    Fanatic

    Posts : 10737
    Reputation : 4327
    Join date : 2016-01-29

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by Loomer Tue May 10, 2022 6:12 pm

    mattnz wrote:How did Kennedy possibly get a week's less suspension than Ramien? Was a far worse tackle.

    Ramien was way worse imo. Kennedy got less with no judicial history
    AL
    AL

    Posts : 1592
    Reputation : 1888
    Join date : 2016-01-10

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by AL Tue May 10, 2022 6:14 pm

    Loomer wrote:

    Ramien was way worse imo. Kennedy got less with no judicial history

    Agree, I’d rather be on the end of Kennedy’s for sure. Looked spectacular though.
    robelgordo
    robelgordo
    Fanatic

    Posts : 13028
    Reputation : 9575
    Join date : 2019-07-08
    Location : Sydney

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by robelgordo Tue May 10, 2022 6:21 pm

    WT Winfield wrote:

    Both Grade 3 Careless. First offence for Kennedy, while Ramien has priors.

    I think Kennedy was a grade 3 careless, which is 2 weeks with an early plea. Whereas Ramien was grade 3 shoulder charge, which is 3 weeks with an early plea

    They were both terrible examples of the kind of tackle. But Ramiens definitely worse in terms of danger, and warrants the extra week. Should’ve been sent. Although Sharks might’ve won by even more with the numbers disadvantage being greater for longer
    avatar
    mattnz
    Fanatic

    Posts : 19887
    Reputation : 7191
    Join date : 2018-03-11
    Location : Your pool

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by mattnz Tue May 10, 2022 6:21 pm

    AL wrote:

    I’m confused (doesn’t take much).

    Are you saying Kennedy’s tackle was ‘much worse’ than Ramien’s, or vice versa?
    Kennedy clothes-line that he was sent off for was far worse than the Ramien tackle, but he got a week's less suspension for it.
    avatar
    mattnz
    Fanatic

    Posts : 19887
    Reputation : 7191
    Join date : 2018-03-11
    Location : Your pool

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by mattnz Tue May 10, 2022 6:22 pm

    WT Winfield wrote:

    Both Grade 3 Careless. First offence for Kennedy, while Ramien has priors.
    Everyone got a clean slate to start the season, priors don't matter for loading.
    robelgordo
    robelgordo
    Fanatic

    Posts : 13028
    Reputation : 9575
    Join date : 2019-07-08
    Location : Sydney

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by robelgordo Tue May 10, 2022 6:23 pm

    Priors only matter for the exact same offence. Ramiens earlier fine this season was grade 1 careless, so no loading for a shoulder charge
    Snatchpato
    Snatchpato

    Posts : 9123
    Reputation : 7789
    Join date : 2020-06-28
    Age : 33
    Location : Gold Coast

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by Snatchpato Tue May 10, 2022 6:24 pm

    mattnz wrote:
    Kennedy clothes-line that he was sent off for was far worse than the Ramien tackle, but he got a week's less suspension for it.
    I dunno man. I'd personally rather be grabbed around the neck/chin as I run by than face a shoulder charge to the head.

    I mean, the outcomes for Walsh (nothing) v Aitken (failed HIA and "very sore" according to his fiance) are telling as well.
    WT Winfield
    WT Winfield

    Posts : 9630
    Reputation : 6982
    Join date : 2016-08-21

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by WT Winfield Tue May 10, 2022 6:26 pm

    mattnz wrote:
    Everyone got a clean slate to start the season, priors don't matter for loading.

    Carry-over points were a clean slate, not offences. Takes 7 years to wipe that clean.
    WT Winfield
    WT Winfield

    Posts : 9630
    Reputation : 6982
    Join date : 2016-08-21

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by WT Winfield Tue May 10, 2022 6:28 pm

    robelgordo wrote:

    I think Kennedy was a grade 3 careless, which is 2 weeks with an early plea. Whereas Ramien was grade 3 shoulder charge, which is 3 weeks with an early plea

    https://www.nrl.com/news/2022/03/13/juduciary-report-all-the-latest-charges/

    "Both were charged with grade 3 careless high tackles offences"

    "Kennedy will miss two games for his first judiciary offence but a prior incident has cost Ramien a three-match ban."

    I looked it up and tried to be succinct Very Happy
    my tv broke
    my tv broke
    Fanatics Immortal

    Posts : 28342
    Reputation : 20985
    Join date : 2016-01-08

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by my tv broke Tue May 10, 2022 6:35 pm

    Welcome back Mattnz
    AL
    AL

    Posts : 1592
    Reputation : 1888
    Join date : 2016-01-10

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by AL Tue May 10, 2022 6:36 pm

    mattnz wrote:
    Kennedy clothes-line that he was sent off for was far worse than the Ramien tackle, but he got a week's less suspension for it.

    I’m on the other side of the fence on this one. Ramien should have been sent too but the refs were too gutless to put them down to 11.
    robelgordo
    robelgordo
    Fanatic

    Posts : 13028
    Reputation : 9575
    Join date : 2019-07-08
    Location : Sydney

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by robelgordo Tue May 10, 2022 6:37 pm

    WT Winfield wrote:

    https://www.nrl.com/news/2022/03/13/juduciary-report-all-the-latest-charges/

    "Both were charged with grade 3 careless high tackles offences"

    "Kennedy will miss two games for his first judiciary offence but a prior incident has cost Ramien a three-match ban."

    I looked it up and tried to be succinct Very Happy

    My bad.

    So yeah he gets the 3 weeks because he’s already been fined this year for a careless.
    Ramitinmyhaaas
    Ramitinmyhaaas

    Posts : 2936
    Reputation : 1695
    Join date : 2021-01-21

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by Ramitinmyhaaas Tue May 10, 2022 6:38 pm

    Wtf McInnes not starting. Guess I won't be joining the McInnes club after all Sad
    WT Winfield
    WT Winfield

    Posts : 9630
    Reputation : 6982
    Join date : 2016-08-21

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by WT Winfield Tue May 10, 2022 6:38 pm

    WT Winfield wrote:

    Carry-over points were a clean slate, not offences. Takes 7 years to wipe that clean.

    Might've been wrong on part of that. Could just be 12 months since a previous incident to wipe that off the record. Who knows anymore when they change rules a day before the season and tweak as the season goes.
    robelgordo
    robelgordo
    Fanatic

    Posts : 13028
    Reputation : 9575
    Join date : 2019-07-08
    Location : Sydney

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis - Page 5 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 42 - Tofu Haggis

    Post by robelgordo Tue May 10, 2022 6:42 pm

    Coathangers always look more spectacular but the Ramien tackle had the potential to be far more consequential. Dunno how anyone could think it wasn’t the worst of the two, unless you only watch them both once

      Current date/time is Sun Sep 08, 2024 10:12 am