NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 56 - Yes Mam!

That’s two weeks in a row Walsh has outscored Tofu

Three weeks is a pattern

Mulvy wrote:Nice updates. 841/13c. Ipap, Moses, Burton,  Ming to go.

Huuuge. Although if Mahoney scores 108 I'll beat you.

rhinoceroo wrote:

Mahoney scores 108

yes

Rabbits21 wrote:

I get why you’d say that but To’o avg 59ish last year he could avg 50 in the run home whilst Tago avg 40. Last 10 weeks Tago avg is 38.3 if he keeps it up he’s not worth it from here.

To'o may have averaged 59 in Vlandy ball, but that drops to 54 with the scoring adjustments.
That was also when he averaged 250MG per game - this year he's only gone over 250 on 2 out of 7 occasions.
Given that last year they had Staines as a comparatively lazy wing (averaging 82MG per game), vs May this year (averaging 169MG per game), I'd suggest that downturn in MG probably continues.

To'o is definitely a good option at his price under the right circumstances, but I'd be careful it's not just sideways trading

Difference between Cleary and Hynes was only 18 right ?

If u took the punt on Hynes for a reason, I can't see the complaint.

pretty annoyed i didn't use the joker round in tipping, seemed too easy, and it was.

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:That’s two weeks in a row Walsh has outscored Tofu

Are you telling me that I can begin to expect this from Walsh?;



I like this idea

Mulvy wrote:Nice updates. 841/13c. Ipap, Moses, Burton,  Ming to go.

HUUUGE Mulvy, well done.

I’ve got same 4 left but about 80 points behind.

easytiger wrote:

Are you telling me that I can begin to expect this from Walsh?;



I like this idea

Why not, need something to go vaguely right this season

easytiger wrote:

Are you telling me that I can begin to expect this from Walsh?;



I like this idea

yes

that'll also do

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:

Why not, need something to go vaguely right this season

my tv broke wrote:

yes

that'll also do

Lock it in, Eddie

Revraiser wrote:Difference between Cleary and Hynes was only 18 right ?

If u took the punt on Hynes for a reason, I can't see the complaint.

Don't you be coming in here with your voice of reason


I must just let the C ride on Hynes for the next two rounds - my season is telling me I like to Captain a 45-60 score

I must admit I have concerns about Payne and Tohu moving forward but will just have to hang tight and have the faith they will sort it out.

P S - Well done Mulvy great score

easytiger wrote:

Don't you be coming in here with your voice of reason


I must just let the C ride on Hynes for the next two rounds - my season is telling me I like to Captain a 45-60 score

Voice of reason from 7k mind u

I'm Cleary every week except a couple like the one gone. It made sense.

Mulvy wrote:Nice updates. 841/13c. Ipap, Moses, Burton,  Ming to go.

Jesus. I thought my team was looking ok. 769 with the same 4 players to come

TheWeapon wrote:

Jesus. I thought my team was looking ok. 769 with the same 4 players to come  

I’m on the same with 3 to go. Not worthy

#TeamPookus has 6 players in the game this afternoon

Chewie wrote:#TeamPookus has 6 players in the game this afternoon

mattnz wrote:

Tevaga robbed of a TO and didn't get a clear line break.

I don't really follow the TO shit as it seems so subjective and IMO I just take them as bonus points but at least the line break stuff they are consistent.  I was thinking about Fermor's big break that didn't get a line break.  Seems from memory the Jazz one was similar so I'm fine with it.  I mean, I can see why they weren't line breaks but at the same time, both players were at the line of defence and got past the defender for another 20 or so metres so I would have thought it would constitute a line break.

Unless the thinking is since it's not your standard put through a whole and then they get to the next line of defence at the FB, the time it takes wresting with the said defender gives the rest of the intial line of defence time to retreat back and stop them eventually?  I can see both sides, but I would think they would be line breaks even if I didn't own the players, but that's obviously wrong so, meh.