NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 56 - Yes Mam!

wolfking wrote:

I don't really follow the TO shit as it seems so subjective and IMO I just take them as bonus points but at least the line break stuff they are consistent.  I was thinking about Fermor's big break that didn't get a line break.  Seems from memory the Jazz one was similar so I'm fine with it.  I mean, I can see why they weren't line breaks but at the same time, both players were at the line of defence and got past the defender for another 20 or so metres so I would have thought it would constitute a line break.

Unless the thinking is since it's not your standard put through a whole and then they get to the next line of defence at the FB, the time it takes wresting with the said defender gives the rest of the intial line of defence time to retreat back and stop them eventually?  I can see both sides, but I would think they would be line breaks even if I didn't own the players, but that's obviously wrong so, meh.

Aardvark wrote:Thank you Friz for scoring exactly the 55 I drafted you in for, maybe should have not waited another week on Hastings though.

A few itchy trigger fingers on outside backs who haven't racked up big scores I see. There's a young fella playing centre for the Sharks who might be worth a punt, scored above 50 on the weekend so it should happen again next week etc.

White Lightning wrote:Currently 872/13 (c) with Burton & M. King to play...Haas (injured), Tohu (underwelming) & Keary (injured) were my let downs.

White Lightning wrote:Reading that Broncos info re Haas is good news because it was estimated he'd miss a month of footy but he has a history of playing through the payne & healing quickly.

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:What would need to change at the Tigers this week to make Hastings a hold. Brooks out?

Loomer wrote:

Not have nerve related foot issue

Daedalus wrote:

Massive score on the cards with only 15 players

Loomer wrote:

Not have nerve related foot issue

wolfking wrote:

I don't really follow the TO shit as it seems so subjective and IMO I just take them as bonus points but at least the line break stuff they are consistent.  I was thinking about Fermor's big break that didn't get a line break.  Seems from memory the Jazz one was similar so I'm fine with it.  I mean, I can see why they weren't line breaks but at the same time, both players were at the line of defence and got past the defender for another 20 or so metres so I would have thought it would constitute a line break.

Unless the thinking is since it's not your standard put through a whole and then they get to the next line of defence at the FB, the time it takes wresting with the said defender gives the rest of the intial line of defence time to retreat back and stop them eventually?  I can see both sides, but I would think they would be line breaks even if I didn't own the players, but that's obviously wrong so, meh.

White Lightning wrote:Reading that Broncos info re Haas is good news because it was estimated he'd miss a month of footy but he has a history of playing through the payne & healing quickly.
Keary on the other hand with his concussion history might see him missing round 15 as they might be more inclined to be conservative. I have the money to go Keary to Pappy with 1 trade depending on the Keary news.