NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 71 - Looking for signs of life

Not watching (waiting for a pizza) but I reckon Elliot jags a 70 this weekend.also this match needs more Tohu

I actually agree with the bunker on that one. Yes the player makes no attempt to roll away but you can't play the ball on the person prone, that's always gone against the attacking team.

Aardvark wrote:Not watching (waiting for a pizza) but I reckon Elliot jags a 70 this weekend.also this match needs more Tohu

Some more Robson involvement would be great too.

Isn't Cotters type of game

Rabbits21 wrote:Did my last trade Elliot to Cotter!

I went Elliott to Fifita.
Ride the highs and lows.
Cotter's a great shout though - one I wish I could have got back in somehow.

filthridden wrote:I actually agree with the bunker on that one. Yes the player makes no attempt to roll away but you can't play the ball on the person prone, that's always gone against the attacking team.

He didn't though. He went to put it down, placed it on a player, picked it up (without losing it), and apparently he knocked it on?

If he lost control I'd 100% agree, but saying that this "constitutes a knock on" is just making up rules at this point

filthridden wrote:I actually agree with the bunker on that one. Yes the player makes no attempt to roll away but you can't play the ball on the person prone, that's always gone against the attacking team.

If that was Victor Radley or JWH on the floor they would have been in the bin for 10 for a professional foul

This is one of those games where Lolo doesn't get a second stint hey.....

Snatchpato wrote:
He didn't though. He went to put it down, placed it on a player, picked it up (without losing it), and apparently he knocked it on?

If he lost control I'd 100% agree, but saying that this "constitutes a knock on" is just making up rules at this point

I don't think his hand came away from the ball but you could see a couple of his fingers come away - he didn't have a grip on it and used the defenders leg to hold onto the ball.
That was the way I saw it anyway and it's bloody hard to tell either way on the images we get.

Snatchpato wrote:
He didn't though. He went to put it down, placed it on a player, picked it up (without losing it), and apparently he knocked it on?

If he lost control I'd 100% agree, but saying that this "constitutes a knock on" is just making up rules at this point

He was trying to milk a penalty. I ALWAYS love it when that backfires, no matter which team it is.

wolfking wrote:This is one of those games where Lolo doesn't get a second stint hey.....

You're good at this.

wolfking wrote:This is one of those games where Lolo doesn't get a second stint hey.....

Brilliant!

DWZ you did not do the correct thing there and that is not unusual.

wolfking wrote:This is one of those games where Lolo doesn't get a second stint hey.....

filthridden wrote:

I don't think his hand came away from the ball but you could see a couple of his fingers come away - he didn't have a grip on it and used the defenders leg to hold onto the ball.
That was the way I saw it anyway and it's bloody hard to tell either way on the images we get.

I didnt even realise what everyone was talking about because i
am watching on mute but i remember seeing that and thinking "knock on" without even paying attention to what actually happened

Snatchpato wrote:
He didn't though. He went to put it down, placed it on a player, picked it up (without losing it), and apparently he knocked it on?

If he lost control I'd 100% agree, but saying that this "constitutes a knock on" is just making up rules at this point

You aren't allowed to use an opponent's body in order to maintain control of the ball. Whether you agree with the rule or not, its a correct decision.

Milchcow wrote:

You aren't allowed to use an opponent's body in order to maintain control of the ball. Whether you agree with the rule or not, its a correct decision.

I dont know what you were watching Milch, but he never lost control of the ball

Milchcow wrote:

You aren't allowed to use an opponent's body in order to maintain control of the ball. Whether you agree with the rule or not, its a correct decision.

Yeah this

We're getting flogged and that was always going to be the case but that decision was a shocker

Moanaman wrote:

I dont know what you were watching Milch, but he never lost control of the ball

Milchy watching the same thing as me, mtb and mulvy apparently.