Aardvark Ratnick wrote:
. I am pretty set on starting with Cookie ATM.
I'll probably go Cook or Grant
Cook is quite tempting and everything else being equal, I'd like to have him, but Grant saves a fair bit of money so definitely an option.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Aardvark Ratnick wrote:
. I am pretty set on starting with Cookie ATM.
Milchcow wrote:
I'll probably go Cook or Grant
Cook is quite tempting and everything else being equal, I'd like to have him, but Grant saves a fair bit of money so definitely an option.
Mulvy wrote:
Worked out okay last year though...
Bethany_B wrote:
I was looking at Grant and Cook but I figured I'd rather just get Murray instead and just use Cheese and Boyd at hooker until I can get Robson in (targeting him for the Origin period as he likely doesn't play Origin and plays 2/3 big bye rounds)
Finger Puppet Mafia wrote:Who is Warbrick taking the place of in the Storm backline. Is it a regular starter?
Finger Puppet Mafia wrote:Who is Warbrick taking the place of in the Storm backline. Is it a regular starter?
Finger Puppet Mafia wrote:Who is Warbrick taking the place of in the Storm backline. Is it a regular starter?
rhinoceroo wrote:
Is this the first Rabbits TU/TD of the year?
Rabbits21 wrote:
2nd I think. Teddy having an early bye might sway me to Murray and Walsh as they have no bye first half of year. Teddy does early.
Genderbender wrote:Just realised I’m going to need a few more coffees before I’m any chance at understanding this
AL wrote:
Or you could take the higher ground and be a non looper and live happily ever after, blissfully unaware.
Genderbender wrote:
I’m always aware when I’m having my ass fed to me every weekend for six months straight buddy…. I think.
Need to learn a few tricks….
Chewie wrote:
Looping has rarely paid off for me in the past, it's very hit and miss.
I guess with the additional bye per round, there will be more opportunities this season to get it right
Alternatively you could just build a team of 18 playable players to mitigate the weekly bye round conundrumGenderbender wrote:
That’s where I’m at buddy, I’ve seen it work for others, not so much for myself but with this new format of byes I think it’s a must to at least understand how it works for the new season. Whether or not I’m any better off or not is another question.
Genderbender wrote:
I’m always aware when I’m having my ass fed to me every weekend for six months straight buddy…. I think.
Need to learn a few tricks….