White Lightning wrote:blore owners he's been officially ruled out as he didn't pass the concussion protocols.
Insert Admiral Ackbar "It's a trap" gif here.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
White Lightning wrote:blore owners he's been officially ruled out as he didn't pass the concussion protocols.
Welsh Mafia wrote:Clearly to Robson for me next week before the week ensues. He'll be a gun HOK and Boyd slots into halves until after Sammy Walkers bye.
Cleary just seems off the pace and is going to drop a couple hundy
White Lightning wrote:blore owners he's been officially ruled out as he didn't pass the concussion protocols.
Welsh Mafia wrote:Clearly to Robson for me next week before the week ensues. He'll be a gun HOK and Boyd slots into halves until after Sammy Walkers bye.
Cleary just seems off the pace and is going to drop a couple hundy
mattnz wrote:
Robson is going to have huge ownership in round 13, has no byes between now and then, its just a matter of when, not if you get him.
White Lightning wrote:
my 2 trades rd. 3 will be cleary to dce & tedesco to latrell
Bethany_B wrote:
I want to do something similar but Murphy's Law is very much a thing, if you sell Cleary he'll smash out a 100 in round 4 just to spite you personally.
my tv broke wrote:
Lastly:
273 teams ranked outside the top 10,000 in round 1 were able to finish inside the top 1000 at seasons end.
Milchcow wrote:obfuscated.
Bethany_B wrote:
I see nothing that could possibly go wrong if you sell Teddy
Clack Bocks wrote:Rabbits21 wrote:So is anyone selling Cheese?
Not this week at least. Only did the one trade which was pele to cartwright.
easytiger wrote:
So, less than 3% outside the top 10k last year managed to make it into the top 1k.
Not saying that this necessarily projects forwards to this year, but that's pretty sobering.
I guess it underlines the point of making sure your start doesn't have any howlers, rather than trying too hard to get an edge...
White Lightning wrote:radley ruled out...whyte to lock...thomas on bench
Snatchpato wrote:Heading up to Suncorp (second week in a row lets go!) to watch Broncos Cowboys. Going to be wearing my Cowboys jersey (actually a friend who's lending it to me) with pride. Sorry if I see you there MTB, we'll have to be enemies.
mrbrownstone wrote:
Some of the reactions to Smith have been wild. Feel like some people have lost their minds a bit (I'm talking more some of the fantasy podcasts, not calling out anyone specific on here).
The narrative has been that he 'didn't get the role we wanted', completely ignoring that he had an HIA, Radley and Lodge both went off injured, AND Robbo telegraphed that he wouldn't play 80 straight away. It's like people wanted him to be a bad buy and are looking for any reason to justify it. So weird.
If ever there was a case of wait and see. Hope he does what Garner did last night to those who sold.