Genderbender wrote:
Oops sorry! To play today, wondering if a 60 min MCK is a better play over an 80 min ITT. Thanks!
MCK will be the better base, and the one I would choose.
ITT could have a Warbrick game of last night or last week...
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Genderbender wrote:
Oops sorry! To play today, wondering if a 60 min MCK is a better play over an 80 min ITT. Thanks!
Antipodean1 wrote:
MCK will be the better base, and the one I would choose.
ITT could have a Warbrick game of last night or last week...
Genderbender wrote:
Was gunna say…neither are a buy lolGenderbender wrote:
Oops sorry! To play today, wondering if a 60 min MCK is a better play over an 80 min ITT. Thanks!
mattnz wrote:
My only rant that I need to happen is Trindall to either start, or get on early, preferably at half back for a decent score. The fun of having 4 red dots this week.
White Lightning wrote:also while i'm here i still have my 2nd trade available. i was going to sell sutton & buy sj would you still go ahead with it or save a trade. cheers.
If you don't need a half, lawton could be a good cash down for him this week.Camo123 wrote:
With 17th man issue you’re probably better off foregoing Trindall minor price rise and selling him this week??
Shady2K wrote:Shocking how Cowboys are so fantasy irrelevant. Only Robson, and Holmes after Origin, are options
Antipodean1 wrote:
I have Robson, bit of a POD. Hoping for a 65+