NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

my tv broke wrote:Toa is probably just there if Bateman isn't good to go, in which case Toa centre, Kepaoa edg and Blore onto bench.

Don't think they run out as listed, regardless.

It's like putting your arm through the bars at the zoo...


You just can't trust the Tigers.

The Goat Boys wrote:

I thought Matamua looked great also in the pre season.

Why didn`t he play first couple of weeks?

Might look at him over Hands

My guess is that Sheens wanted him playing big minutes to get his fitness up, so was playing big minute lock in reserve grade, can now come in and play like we saw in the trial, high work rate (=high PPM) 40+ minutes.

code delta wrote:I've many pages to catch up on so sorry if this has been covered.
Is Suluka-Fifita at the bunnies a potential cow? JS?

Hasn't been discussed, but I can't see much value there. Brendan Hands has more upside for a similar price point

Antipodean1 wrote:

It's like putting your arm through the bars at the zoo...


You just can't trust the Tigers.

Or a rabbitohs glory glory hole
Though at least you don’t have to worry about teeth

Has Ofahengaue really been that bad this year? I just don't get how you go from being the player of the year to reserve grade without any real noticeable form change (not that tigers player of the year means much)

Alfie wrote:Has Ofahengaue really been that bad this year? I just don't get how you go from being the player of the year to reserve grade without any real noticeable form change (not that tigers player of the year means much)

Gun players who are not clicking together.


It's all down to pure Shenius.

Stylebender wrote:

^^^

TAB the dogs banned me because I went on a huge streak of live betting NRL games. They assumed I was at the stadium with a laptop placing bets before they adjusted their odds.

I did this back in the day at the first Auckland Nines tourney on Betfair betting from my phone at the stadium. Didn't bet anything crazy as I was pretty skint but made a couple hundred just betting on whoever scored a try. Nines was perfect for it because of how fast the action was.

Antipodean1 wrote:All common sense aside, Hosking kills it from an eye-test and base stats point of view...also there are a bunch of fallen guns you can switch to IF Hosking is short lived.

It comes down to your gut, jump on now for cash gen...or pick him up as a cut-price keeper next week.

The difference will be about 60k.

SJ went up 50k for score of 70 and official BE was mid 20s and Hosking -6 official BE could make 60k with average score. Could go up a lot more

I'm thinking Sutton to Hosking for a flutter....no real urgency to trade but might as well give it a crack (I have Ford).

Sutton has been ok without being spectacular so is stuck at around $540k

Aardvark wrote:I'm thinking Sutton to Hosking for a flutter....no real urgency to trade but might as well give it a crack (I have Ford).

Sutton has been ok without being spectacular so is stuck at around $540k

Doing the same with Uto I think.

However Uto looks better than sutton with bit more money to be made.

Loomer wrote:

SJ went up 50k for score of 70 and official BE was mid 20s and Hosking -6 official BE could make 60k with average score. Could go up a lot more

I doubt he gets more than an average score, he's not exactly a tearaway. Somewhere between 50 and 60 seems realistic. Also, I don't think 60k would scare people off if his role is solidified

The potential cost of not getting Hosking far outweighs the potential negative of getting him for mine.


Ignoring injuries fucking up everything, worst case he is a quick cash grab that you use to springboard to a fallen gun, or turn into cash to upgrade elsewhere. Even if he doesn't quite hit the 150k a trade threshold, he'll make a decent amount of money and you'll just be disappointed he didn't make more, but you'll be in the same boat as plenty of others. And the cheap cows are pretty dry right now. It isn't that bad of an outcome.

If you don't pick him, worst case if he soars away and becomes a cut price keeper or makes a bunch of money that you miss out on.

Plus I've been running Carty as one of my starting edges and that boat is going to leave the harbour shortly.

Loomer wrote:

SJ went up 50k for score of 70 and official BE was mid 20s and Hosking -6 official BE could make 60k with average score. Could go up a lot more

was using https://www.footystatistics.com/

Yep - he could go up 100k with a big score and the Raiders edge he is on is down Wighton this week.

I reckon if someone trades Hosking in and they don't have Cleary, they could reasonably consider (C)Hosking

The Goat Boys wrote:

Doing the same with Uto I think.

However Uto looks better than sutton with bit more money to be made.

Yeah, it was between Uto & Sutton for me at the start of the year. Went with the 'safe' option which has been underwhelming...if I had Uto I'd probably be thinking harder about it

Aardvark wrote:I'm thinking Sutton to Hosking for a flutter....no real urgency to trade but might as well give it a crack (I have Ford).

Sutton has been ok without being spectacular so is stuck at around $540k

yeah i own sutton too & considering selling him but someone on here made a good point earlier that with brown out & the bench including j. reynolds, waddell, pele, tanner then sutton may get an extra 5-10 mins which will see him scoring 45-50 points.

Loomer wrote:

SJ went up 50k for score of 70 and official BE was mid 20s and Hosking -6 official BE could make 60k with average score. Could go up a lot more

I've seen you post this a few times but BE listed as 6 and not -6. That being said 50-55 still makes 60-72k which is solid

I'm part of the ford vs hosking camp and at the moment ford instead getting a 45-50 hopefully vs hosking getting 50-60 costs me likely 20k but allows a look at next week's teamlists, so ford first is how i'm leaning currently

That being said my bank trading trindall is exactly 541k for hosking, and hard to go past signs like that..

Ponga Yeo the Mann wrote:

I've seen you post this a few times but BE listed as 6 and not -6. That being said 50-55 still makes 60-72k which is solid

I'm part of the ford vs hosking camp and at the moment ford instead getting a 45-50 hopefully vs hosking getting 50-60 costs me likely 20k but allows a look at next week's teamlists, so ford first is how i'm leaning currently

That being said my bank trading trindall is exactly 541k for hosking, and hard to go past signs like that..

That is an omen...

Ponga Yeo the Mann wrote:

I've seen you post this a few times but BE listed as 6 and not -6. That being said 50-55 still makes 60-72k which is solid

I'm part of the ford vs hosking camp and at the moment ford instead getting a 45-50 hopefully vs hosking getting 50-60 costs me likely 20k but allows a look at next week's teamlists, so ford first is how i'm leaning currently

That being said my bank trading trindall is exactly 541k for hosking, and hard to go past signs like that..

If I didn’t have to get rid of Hodgson this week I’d potentially look at Ford and Hosking so hoping for the best from Ford. Money-making hasn’t been too tough so far this year and if all goes well should continue nicely.