NRL Fantasy Fanatics



Join the forum, it's quick and easy

NRL Fantasy Fanatics

NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports

    NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    avatar
    mattnz
    Fanatic

    Posts : 19887
    Reputation : 7191
    Join date : 2018-03-11
    Location : Your pool

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by mattnz Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:07 pm

    Alfie wrote:Has Ofahengaue really been that bad this year? I just don't get how you go from being the player of the year to reserve grade without any real noticeable form change (not that tigers player of the year means much)

    Probably ends up at the Dogs.
    Antipodean1
    Antipodean1

    Posts : 3005
    Reputation : 1511
    Join date : 2021-03-02
    Location : NZ

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by Antipodean1 Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:07 pm

    Alright, you guys have convinced me, I have brought in Hosking and Ford.

    I have DCE in the halves so didn't have to get Cleary, and now I might just hold Boyd through for round 6 and go straight to DCE/Hynes from R7.

    and I managed to offload the terrible BMM as well, so that works for me.


    Last edited by Antipodean1 on Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:09 pm; edited 1 time in total
    ytsb
    ytsb

    Posts : 2521
    Reputation : 2440
    Join date : 2020-03-04

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by ytsb Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:08 pm

    Chewie wrote:

    Reeks of Lando Calrissian to me

    Haha yeah that's the first reaction. Sounds too good to be true doesn't it? Just letting people know about it - not suggesting anybody does it.
    Back Nine Bandits
    Back Nine Bandits

    Posts : 54
    Reputation : 123
    Join date : 2023-03-28

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by Back Nine Bandits Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:09 pm

    Antipodean1 wrote:

    That is an omen...

    Reminds me of the time when I had the perfect amount of money for Moylan a couple of years ago.

    Needless to say that did not end well.
    Jumping Marlin
    Jumping Marlin

    Posts : 1455
    Reputation : 1415
    Join date : 2018-05-16

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by Jumping Marlin Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:09 pm

    Not fantasy relevant, but interesting article about why the Dragons suck.

    https://www.theroar.com.au/2023/03/29/slow-progress-why-are-anthony-griffins-dragons-so-bad-and-can-he-fix-it/

    TLDR: they take way longer to complete their sets than anyone else, even though they play boring footy with not many passes.  Last week they were almost 50/50 in time in possession but Sharks had 47 sets to the Dragons 34


    Last edited by Jumping Marlin on Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:11 pm; edited 1 time in total
    avatar
    mattnz
    Fanatic

    Posts : 19887
    Reputation : 7191
    Join date : 2018-03-11
    Location : Your pool

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by mattnz Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:10 pm

    Aardvark wrote:

    Yeah, it was between Uto & Sutton for me at the start of the year. Went with the 'safe' option which has been underwhelming...if I had Uto I'd probably be thinking harder about it

    Uto doesn't get the double movement try and you are thinking very differently about him - 2 scores in 30s, a 40 and getting 45 minutes a week.
    Loomer
    Loomer
    Fanatic

    Posts : 10738
    Reputation : 4331
    Join date : 2016-01-29

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by Loomer Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:11 pm

    Antipodean1 wrote:

    was using https://www.footystatistics.com/

    Yep - he could go up 100k with a big score and the Raiders edge he is on is down Wighton this week.

    I reckon if someone trades Hosking in and they don't have Cleary, they could reasonably consider (C)Hosking Razz

    It's seems regularly 5-10 higher BE than official in this case 10pts different
    Aardvark
    Aardvark

    Posts : 7671
    Reputation : 7924
    Join date : 2018-03-01
    Location : Parents basement eating Cheetos

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by Aardvark Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:12 pm

    White Lightning wrote:

    yeah i own sutton too & considering selling him but someone on here made a good point earlier that with brown out & the bench including j. reynolds, waddell, pele, tanner then sutton may get an extra 5-10 mins which will see him scoring 45-50 points.

    Yeah haven't completely made up my mind yet but my gut feel is that Sutton stalls between $550-$600k and around 40 points/week, which is fine but not anything to write home about.....so I'm leaning towards selling.
    Loomer
    Loomer
    Fanatic

    Posts : 10738
    Reputation : 4331
    Join date : 2016-01-29

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by Loomer Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:12 pm

    Jumping Marlin wrote:Not fantasy relevant, but interesting article about why the Dragons suck.

    https://www.theroar.com.au/2023/03/29/slow-progress-why-are-anthony-griffins-dragons-so-bad-and-can-he-fix-it/

    TLDR: they take way longer to complete their sets than anyone else, even though they play boring footy with not many passes.  Last week they were almost 50/50 in time in possession but Sharks had 47 sets to the Dragons 34

    Sounds like Warriors last season without checking
    ytsb
    ytsb

    Posts : 2521
    Reputation : 2440
    Join date : 2020-03-04

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by ytsb Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:13 pm

    the_great_wobbler wrote:

    I did this back in the day at the first Auckland Nines tourney on Betfair betting from my phone at the stadium. Didn't bet anything crazy as I was pretty skint but made a couple hundred just betting on whoever scored a try. Nines was perfect for it because of how fast the action was.

    People also still do this and make a few hundred per game. It sounds like NRL and cricket's the best for it for some reason.
    Jumping Marlin
    Jumping Marlin

    Posts : 1455
    Reputation : 1415
    Join date : 2018-05-16

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by Jumping Marlin Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:14 pm

    mattnz wrote:

    Uto doesn't get the double movement try and you are thinking very differently about him - 2 scores in 30s, a 40 and getting 45 minutes a week.

    Swings and roundabouts. The week he got that try he also set a big PB for negatives with 3 errors, 2 penalties, a couple of 6 agains against.
    Aardvark
    Aardvark

    Posts : 7671
    Reputation : 7924
    Join date : 2018-03-01
    Location : Parents basement eating Cheetos

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by Aardvark Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:16 pm

    mattnz wrote:

    Uto doesn't get the double movement try and you are thinking very differently about him - 2 scores in 30s, a 40 and getting 45 minutes a week.

    Which is why I choose Sutton...looked like it was going alright for a few rounds but watching the games in the last few weeks it doesn't look like he's putting his hand up for more minutes

    TBH I just think of Uto was a younger Moses Leota in that he looks great but is destined to never be that fantasy relevant
    GreenSchist
    GreenSchist

    Posts : 826
    Reputation : 759
    Join date : 2023-02-15

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by GreenSchist Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:22 pm

    Antipodean1 wrote:Alright, you guys have convinced me, I have brought in Hosking and Ford.

    I have DCE in the halves so didn't have to get Cleary, and now I might just hold Boyd through for round 6 and go straight to DCE/Hynes from R7.

    and I managed to offload the terrible BMM as well, so that works for me.

    I like it. Patience is a virtue
    Liverpool_Bulldog
    Liverpool_Bulldog
    Fanatic

    Posts : 19477
    Reputation : 6801
    Join date : 2016-02-14
    Location : New Zealand

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by Liverpool_Bulldog Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:26 pm

    Who would you get rid of for Ford? Trindall or HSS. HSS removes CTR cover from the bench. Have Talau feels from him
    Oz Sport Mad
    Oz Sport Mad

    Posts : 1927
    Reputation : 777
    Join date : 2015-09-28

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by Oz Sport Mad Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:29 pm

    Jumping Marlin wrote:Not fantasy relevant, but interesting article about why the Dragons suck.

    https://www.theroar.com.au/2023/03/29/slow-progress-why-are-anthony-griffins-dragons-so-bad-and-can-he-fix-it/

    TLDR: they take way longer to complete their sets than anyone else, even though they play boring footy with not many passes.  Last week they were almost 50/50 in time in possession but Sharks had 47 sets to the Dragons 34

    Definitely fantasy relevant.

    Something to consider for tackle dependant scorers, when playing the Dragons.

    I used to loved the Raiders for the opposite of this, as they would try roll through the middle and run one out off the ruck - so tacklers would always rack up huge numbers playing them.
    Moanaman
    Moanaman

    Posts : 3296
    Reputation : 2940
    Join date : 2020-01-27
    Location : Up the Wahs!

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by Moanaman Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:29 pm

    My view on Hosking

    He's an easy in, makes 200K if he plays at a similar level for the next two weeks then Him and Carty become Hynes and a Nuffie after the Sharks Bye
    GreenSchist
    GreenSchist

    Posts : 826
    Reputation : 759
    Join date : 2023-02-15

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by GreenSchist Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:32 pm

    Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Who would you get rid of for Ford? Trindall or HSS. HSS removes CTR cover from the bench. Have Talau feels from him

    I think I have a higher risk appetite than you do, and as such would opt for trading HSS. Roll with the zero cover. Yes it may screw you for a late exclusion but that is unlikely and if a CTR cops an injury this weekend, just make a necessary trade the following week.

    Trindall makes money for doing nothing this week. trade him for that centre cover next week
    The Goat Boys
    The Goat Boys

    Posts : 917
    Reputation : 762
    Join date : 2020-01-18
    Location : QLD

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by The Goat Boys Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:34 pm

    Currently going Uto and Doorey to Hosking and Hands

    Thoughts on this? First week where I have been a bit lost.
    mintotheimmortal
    mintotheimmortal

    Posts : 705
    Reputation : 368
    Join date : 2019-03-08

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by mintotheimmortal Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:36 pm

    Jack Bostock anyone?
    Liverpool_Bulldog
    Liverpool_Bulldog
    Fanatic

    Posts : 19477
    Reputation : 6801
    Join date : 2016-02-14
    Location : New Zealand

     NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me - Page 42 Empty Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

    Post by Liverpool_Bulldog Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:46 pm

    GreenSchist wrote:

    I think I have a higher risk appetite than you do, and as such would opt for trading HSS. Roll with the zero cover. Yes it may screw you for a late exclusion but that is unlikely and if a CTR cops an injury this weekend, just make a necessary trade the following week.

    Trindall makes money for doing nothing this week. trade him for that centre cover next week
    Yeah it feels straight forward. Does make my emergency a bit lopsided either way. The other option is to jump on the band wagon and go Trindall to Hoskins. 

    I’ve tooted the money making horn of Ford enough though so should probably plant the flag

      Current date/time is Sat Nov 23, 2024 3:22 pm