MF wrote:
You should see them though
Tandem on special occasions ?
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
MF wrote:
You should see them though
Bethany_B wrote:
Not if you bought him after his 100, which a lot of people did.
I bought him the week of his 100 for 559k and sold him four weeks later for 699k, so a 140k profit. You only made 350k if you bought him the week he moved to centre (round 4, for 355k)
mintotheimmortal wrote:Jack Bostock anyone?
Oz Sport Mad wrote:
Definitely fantasy relevant.
Something to consider for tackle dependant scorers, when playing the Dragons.
I used to loved the Raiders for the opposite of this, as they would try roll through the middle and run one out off the ruck - so tacklers would always rack up huge numbers playing them.
code delta wrote:I've many pages to catch up on so sorry if this has been covered.
Is Suluka-Fifita at the bunnies a potential cow? JS?
Jumping Marlin wrote:Not fantasy relevant, but interesting article about why the Dragons suck.
https://www.theroar.com.au/2023/03/29/slow-progress-why-are-anthony-griffins-dragons-so-bad-and-can-he-fix-it/
TLDR: they take way longer to complete their sets than anyone else, even though they play boring footy with not many passes. Last week they were almost 50/50 in time in possession but Sharks had 47 sets to the Dragons 34
I’m usually quite conservative but have used 5 trades already . Only banked 1 and that was the first week. Likely to be using another 2, hopefully can slow down soonPapadontbleach wrote:I'm not feeling the Hoskings love, he had a good game, cool. It was likely an above average game but there is still risk he may not play next week. Also, he's expensive.
Not worth the risk to me but respect to those who are bringing him in. I tend to play more conservative than others and I'm stingy on trades early on.
Antipodean1 wrote:
It's like putting your arm through the bars at the zoo...
You just can't trust the Tigers.
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
I’m usually quite conservative but have used 5 trades already . Only banked 1 and that was the first week. Likely to be using another 2, hopefully can slow down soon
Papadontbleach wrote:I'm not feeling the Hoskings love, he had a good game, cool. It was likely an above average game but there is still risk he may not play next week. Also, he's expensive.
Not worth the risk to me but respect to those who are bringing him in. I tend to play more conservative than others and I'm stingy on trades early on.
Loomer wrote:
It's seems regularly 5-10 higher BE than official in this case 10pts different
BBowler wrote:
Hmm Carrigan only got 51 va Dragons and he loves a tackle
whall15 wrote:I have the cash in reserve to go TMM and Doorey to Ford and Hosking. Thinking Hosking as a short term cash generator to bring in Hynes after the bye, though it does leave my team very forward heavy (and starting IKatoa and Warbrick this week).
Grant
Haas Hopgood Murray
Katoa CartwrightBoydCleary
Alamoti Nully
Miller Teddy Warbrick
Hosking Ford Preston Uto
Loiero HSS ITT IKatoa
Feels a bit weird having Loiero in reserve this early on, but the cash generation seems too good. Thoughts?
Milchcow wrote:
Anyone who subscribes to Butters site want to posy a couple of BEs for popular players to compare to official/mtb?
He had decent predictions last year. Most of the time it doesn't matter too much anyway. 10 points can be a bit of a swing, but if a BE being out by 5 can ruin your trade, then it probably wasn't the best trade anyway
White Lightning wrote:on betting the nrl it's too much risk for the return as any team can beat the other on it's day
you get a better return at a lower risk betting on the football premier league because the results are pretty much as expected & you know who will get the attacking stats like goals/assists