NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by my tv broke Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:33 pm
robelgordo wrote:
Yeah agree 100% on the last point
I can't be arsed to do the maths, and MTBs 3 game average doesn't like negatives, but I reckon 14000ish gets yo a -6 BE for Hoskings. And I'd be surprised if the MN has been that high for awhile.
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by Jumping Marlin Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:33 pm
robelgordo wrote:I think I've just about been convinced it's Hoskings time. Although I do think people are throwing around "it's only one trade" pretty flippantly.
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by Milchcow Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:35 pm
| Salary | Score | MN |
| $136,948,000 | 9821 | 13944 |
| $135,540,000 | 9863 | 13742 |
| $132,378,000 | 9940 | 13318 |
| $134,431,000 | 10380 | 12951 |
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by Finch Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:36 pm
Welsh Mafia wrote:
Cmon dude, be better. You asked the same question a few days ago and got a resounding "yes". I'm surprised people gave you feedback as it seems that you make 1 post a week to provide us your team and your trade plans, then disappear for the week. Should we consider ourselves lucky this week to get a second post, of which you wouldn'tve needed if you took the time to actually read the feedback that people put their time and effort into for you.
We're all here to help each other, you're a great fantasy player and could help lots of people if you put some effort in as well.. nobody likes someone that just takes from the table.
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by Finch Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:37 pm
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by mattnz Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:38 pm
SoylentGreen wrote:Is Hosking a better trade in than Miller?
I've got to bring in a half this week, so it's between those 2 for the other trade.
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by Milchcow Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:45 pm
Jumping Marlin wrote:robelgordo wrote:I think I've just about been convinced it's Hoskings time. Although I do think people are throwing around "it's only one trade" pretty flippantly.
Worst case is it two trades? Eg if you trade Sutton out to Hosking then Hosking out to a Sutton like player a week later, that’s possibly two trades vs the do nothing scenario.
Having said that, I’m on the Hosking train (already have Ford). A lot of upside possibilities for the risk.
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by BBowler Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:46 pm
mattnz wrote:
At NSW he probably ends up at CTR, with Turbo on the wing in a roving role.
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by my tv broke Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:48 pm
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by GarethEllisismyDad Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:48 pm
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by Milchcow Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:48 pm
BBowler wrote:mattnz wrote:
At NSW he probably ends up at CTR, with Turbo on the wing in a roving role.
You don’t think he would take Wighton’s role? Wighton a better fit at centre..
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by mattnz Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:49 pm
BBowler wrote:
You don’t think he would take Wighton’s role? Wighton a better fit at centre..
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by Milchcow Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:50 pm
my tv broke wrote:Is everyone else burning through trades ? Ive max traded so far which is not my norm. Doesnt appear to be slowing down any time soon with Hynes or Cleary someone I need to get soon.
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by mattnz Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:50 pm
Milchcow wrote:
I think matt was just making a comment on NSW's tendency to pick random players out of position every year, rather than making a genuine origin prediction
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by mattnz Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:51 pm
GarethEllisismyDad wrote:If the hosking trade works out half as well as last years talakai train then I’ll be very happy
(Admittedly Matt convinced me to get on him at first opportunity, made 300k and got the 100 pointer etc)
Some of you have teams that get me thinking I’ll never catch up, great work on choosing well
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by BBowler Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:52 pm
my tv broke wrote:NRLPhysio mentioned Pangai out "a few more weeks" (what gus said) and Pangai commented with "you dont know" and then blocked him... lol
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by Grouse Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:53 pm
mattnz wrote:
Turbo and Mitchell are the CTRs at full strength, Wighton doesnt get a look in if both available.
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by Aardvark Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:54 pm
Grouse wrote:
You'd have to think full strength NSW backline will lineup as:
1. Teddy
2. To'o
3. Mitchell
4. TommyT
5. Ado-Car/Suaali'i
6. Hynes
7. Cleary
14. Wighton
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by Camo123 Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:57 pm
my tv broke wrote:Is everyone else burning through trades ? Ive max traded so far which is not my norm. Doesnt appear to be slowing down any time soon with Hynes or Cleary someone I need to get soon.
Re: NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me by SoylentGreen Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:59 pm
my tv broke wrote:Is everyone else burning through trades ? Ive max traded so far which is not my norm. Doesnt appear to be slowing down any time soon with Hynes or Cleary someone I need to get soon.
Home
Milchcow