NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 24 - Responsibility is not a good look for me

Damn, TMM out this week is not ideal.

filthridden wrote:@my tv broke

"Not a number between 12500 and 15500 ya gronk" I lost it

OMFG LMFAO!!

If I get Hynes I have 237k to spend

Named players are

Wilemu grieg (starting for parra)
Franklin pele (bench dogs forward)
Weekes (manly bench utility)
Burbo (manly bench utility)
Price (NQ mid debut)
Matamua (wests mid yet to appear this year)
Granville (NQ legendary utility)

Which of these would you prefer

GarethEllisismyDad wrote:If I get Hynes I have 237k to spend

Named players are

Wiley grieg (starting for parra)
Franklin pele (bench dogs forward)
Weekes (manly bench utility)
Burbo (manly bench utility)
Price (NQ mid debut)
Matamua (wests mid yet to appear this year)
Granville (NQ legendary utility)

Which of these would you prefer

I`m not sure Hynes is worth it if it means getting stuck with one of those guys on your emergency for a while with stalled cash gen.

mattnz wrote:Just a reality check for those looking at Hosking, has never averaged more than 56 in any season in reserve grade. Might be a cheap keeper, but no certainty on job security or minutes when Panthers have Garner and Martin back.

Ford is $160k less and looks to have an 80 minute EDG to himself and is dual.

Hosking has started at second row 4 times in the NRL in first grade for scores of 57, 71, 55 and 94.

For me, it's two out of Hosking, Ford and Nully. Nully more sensible to put at centre but thinking of playing the shit centre and WFB roulette again and getting Hosking and Ford.

Hosking feels like that one you leave because of the uncertainty behind the role but continues to keep starting. I've banked 2 trades so feel I can take the punt.

wolfking wrote:For me, it's two out of Hosking, Ford and Nully.  Nully more sensible to put at centre but thinking of playing the shit centre and WFB roulette again and getting Hosking and Ford.

Hosking feels like that one you leave because of the uncertainty behind the role but continues to keep starting.  I've banked 2 trades so feel I can take the punt.

Hosking is most likely gonna be the guy that a lot of people had doubts about and then in 3 weeks time, he`s up 200k and your wondering why you still play fantasy.

Surprised people are talking about Hosking as a must have. He probably would be if we knew he'd won the spot rather than Garner and Martin being out but he could easily be out of the team entirely in a couple weeks.

Has a very small sample size of games to go off, not sure what sort of average people are expecting, 50 seems reasonable?

Certainly a viable trade in but def not a must have. Initial thoughts are that I might have to give him a miss

BCT05 wrote:Surprised people are talking about Hosking as a must have. He probably would be if we knew he'd won the spot rather than Garner and Martin being out but he could easily be out of the team entirely in a couple weeks.

Has a very small sample size of games to go off, not sure what sort of average people are expecting, 50 seems reasonable?

Certainly a viable trade in but def not a must have. Initial thoughts are that I might have to give him a miss

Garner is shit. He's had one good half this year.

wolfking wrote:

Garner is shit.  He's had one good half this year.  

Do you think Ivan agrees?

wolfking wrote:For me, it's two out of Hosking, Ford and Nully.  Nully more sensible to put at centre but thinking of playing the shit centre and WFB roulette again and getting Hosking and Ford.

Hosking feels like that one you leave because of the uncertainty behind the role but continues to keep starting.  I've banked 2 trades so feel I can take the punt.

Basically looking at bringing these three in this week as well, plus Miller - I started with Latrell/CNK/Warbrick as my back 3 so that hasn't completely worked out

BCT05 wrote:Surprised people are talking about Hosking as a must have. He probably would be if we knew he'd won the spot rather than Garner and Martin being out but he could easily be out of the team entirely in a couple weeks.

Has a very small sample size of games to go off, not sure what sort of average people are expecting, 50 seems reasonable?

Certainly a viable trade in but def not a must have. Initial thoughts are that I might have to give him a miss

It comes down to how much you've got in the bank.

People are either looking to jump on a price rise + some decent points, or downgrade to rise back up (if that makes sense).

To me, trading Hosking in and then potentially out doesn't make much sense for maybe 200k. But again, it depends.

And finally, people love a high score and get caught up in th3 hype of it.

BCT05 wrote:

Do you think Ivan agrees?

I hope so!

mickspicks wrote:

It comes down to how much you've got in the bank.

People are either looking to jump on a price rise + some decent points, or downgrade to rise back up (if that makes sense).

To me, trading Hosking in and then potentially out doesn't make much sense for maybe 200k. But again, it depends.

And finally, people love a high score and get caught up in th3 hype of it.

General rule is that a trade is worth around 150K so if he were to make 200K, that's a big win in my book.

wolfking wrote:General rule is that a trade is worth around 150K so if he were to make 200K, that's a big win in my book.

So when I traded out Alamoti, and then traded him back in by accident. Was that the win?

wolfking wrote:

General rule is that a trade is worth around 150K so if he were to make 200K, that's a big win in my book.

Wouldn't a trade be worth less now that there's more of them available?

wolfking wrote:

General rule is that a trade is worth around 150K so if he were to make 200K, that's a big win in my book.

Unless the guy you trade out for him also makes $100k over that time

wolfking wrote:

General rule is that a trade is worth around 150K so if he were to make 200K, that's a big win in my book.

True. I guessed 200k Max just with the 90+ and potential for 50... but I also just remembered Martin will be back soon so you'd probably have to hold red dot Hosking until origin where he probably gets minutes again.

Of course, this all depends if he's in over Garner or not.

Tofu and Doorey turns into Brailey and Hosking pretty easily, could ride Hosking back up to Tofu. Hmmm, wish there was better injury news.

What MN are we considering reasonable at the moment? I've been using 13500 but it might be way off.