NRL Fantasy 2023 Part 32 - All trade in's must have a full set of teeth

Snatchpato wrote:Hame Sele still got 45 km

Maybe he did? I can't remember. Cook got his one point from Kms so I'm happy.

Krump wrote:
If you can work out a way to make the draw fair I’d be all ears. On the warriors I think every team should have taken a game to nz this year for what they’ve done for the comp.

That's....a really good sounding idea.

You'd think we play for prizes of $5,000 for the top 500 every week the way us clowns treat this shemozzle of a game.


Chin, chin though !

Most of the Phins did FA the second half. Sucks about Niko but JMK also got like 10 points in the second half

Hopefully Niko turns his scoring around and not be a failed cow

Not at all concerned about Hammer, who you can pick at centre, having a 28 (went very close to scoring as well) when every big name fullback has done the same in the past.

For instance, safe base Kiraz with his 29 last week. Latrell with a 25 a few weeks ago, Turbo 16 last week, Teddy had a 29 at the start of the year.

It happens to the best of them.

Regulator wrote:Not at all concerned about Hammer, who you can pick at centre, having a 28 (went very close to scoring as well) when every big name fullback has done the same in the past.

For instance, safe base Kiraz with his 29 last week. Latrell with a 25 a few weeks ago, Turbo 16 last week, Teddy had a 29 at the start of the year.

It happens to the best of them.

Hammer 28 is only a problem if you bought him this week, which I don't imagine many did

Snatchpato wrote:Fun fact, based on a MN of 13,500 and Hynes' price not changing, Lemuelu would need to have scored 499 points this week to be the most expensive player by next week.

here for this sort of thing

BCT05 wrote:I mean in this case Matt just posted two pretty factual things - we did find out what HTF scores without a try (not to say that will be the norm of course) and Lemuelu has been pretty shit lately

Mums been telling me that it’s not what you say it’s how you say it since I was six years old. Matt knows that and I’m a fan anyway but if you’re gonna send it out there it’s gonna come back.

Krump wrote:
If you can work out a way to make the draw fair I’d be all ears. On the warriors I think every team should have taken a game to nz this year for what they’ve done for the comp.

They should have had every team bring one game to different places in NZ, like the Tigers did (Manly and Dogs have done it previously).

Would have meant the Warriors didn't get a season full of home games at Mt Smart for people to moan about, but cuts their travel a bit as a "thanks" and spreads the game more.

Regulator wrote:Not at all concerned about Hammer, who you can pick at centre, having a 28 (went very close to scoring as well) when every big name fullback has done the same in the past.

For instance, safe base Kiraz with his 29 last week. Latrell with a 25 a few weeks ago, Turbo 16 last week, Teddy had a 29 at the start of the year.

It happens to the best of them.

Yeah has pretty solid base, just no ball in the 2nd half.

mattnz wrote:

Looping Crossland at 18.

I'm half interested in Crossland. A pretty easy wait and see though.

Yet again out of trades wrote:Take katoas 39 or gamble on warbrick / akp ?

Only a ciggy butt brain would turn down the 39

Well that was dull

Finger Puppet Mafia wrote:

Or had a second Magic Round in NZ. Which would be great for spreading the game.

Try selling that to Vlandys without offering a few million in return. I’d have gone

Krump wrote:
If you can work out a way to make the draw fair I’d be all ears. On the warriors I think every team should have taken a game to nz this year for what they’ve done for the comp.

Plenty of pundits talked about this last year but it all went quiet once the draw came out. Good on the Tigers for bringing a game to NZ.

Krump wrote:
If you can work out a way to make the draw fair I’d be all ears. On the warriors I think every team should have taken a game to nz this year for what they’ve done for the comp.

Only way to make comp fair is have everyone playing each other home and away and playing GF at a neutral venue or rotating venue as the NFL does. Obviously, there are too many teams to do that so that can't be done. A way the NRL can attempt to even out travel time differences between teams, is to look at giving long distance travelling teams eg Warriors/Cowboys back to back away games in the same city (Sydney or Brisbane) with a 6 or 7 day turnaround so they can have the option of staying and setting up camp over a two week window. Rather than returning flying relatively long distances home then potentially back on another plane 4 or 5 days later to the next away game.

Just some ideas.

Regulator wrote:

They should have had every team bring one game to different places in NZ, like the Tigers did (Manly and Dogs have done it previously).

Would have meant the Warriors didn't get a season full of home games at Mt Smart for people to moan about, but cuts their travel a bit as a "thanks" and spreads the game more.

Not to mention loads of NRL players are from the regions

Cake Tiger wrote:

Plenty of pundits talked about this last year but it all went quiet once the draw came out. Good on the Tigers for bringing a game to NZ.

I hope no one thinks that we did it for altruistic reasons. Would have been money and nothing more

Need the 20th team in NZ. Surely there is a market and appetite for that there.

***Not a NZ'er

Krump wrote:
Youve already robbed the bank. Don’t try to hold up a servo during the getaway

That's a great fucking analogy.



Also,