mulvy wrote:Milchy is BE for Fensom correct at 34? NRL has him at 85, and surely he is losing money this week?
Fensom is wrong on my sheet.
Basically my calculations at the moment can't distinguish missing a game completely, and playing but scoring 0.
So its treating Fensom as having missed last week altogether. I'll get it fixed up at some point, but it won't be until next week.