Finch wrote:PS - Voting was split, so the chairman dude had to split it
My guess was right!
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Finch wrote:PS - Voting was split, so the chairman dude had to split it
rhinoceroo wrote:standard-issue wrote:
If you've got both the time and inclination would love a breakdown mate . Even Winfield and Finchy are looping in these crazy times with the 17 team schedule, so no issues posting in the main thread I don't think.
WFB Ted
16 Hopgood
17 Simonsson
18 Preston
19 Ponga
20 DCE
21 Sandon
In practice, there's almost no chance I don't play DCE, but watch the Dogs/Knights game. If I like both Preston and Ponga then bring Simo into WFB and choose between Ted and DCE for 17 (DCE)
If I like Preston but not Ponga, then just promote DCE and leave Ted in WFB.
If I like Ponga but not Preston then Simo into WFB, DCE into 16 and Sandon into 17.
If I don't like either Ponga or Preston then bring DCE and Sandon into 16/17
I might use Robson instead of Preston at 18, but same process.
mattnz wrote:The judiciary hearing is now deliberating as to what suspension will be handed to Walsh.
This reminds me of "The Ents"
Just input the data into your abacus and let it work it out for you.standard-issue wrote:
Thankyou kindly rhino, will try to absorb this tomorrow; I might be half a chance when sober...
Fortitude wrote:
Bentspoke red nut. Named after horse brah?
Bentspoke is the superior beer in Canberra, capital brewing is poo, the trail pale ale and rock hopper ipa in particular
Contrastinghobby wrote:10.14pm The 2 documents presented will need to be analysed
It contains the top 1000 nrl fantasy teams along with Mattnz forecasted gains from the verdict
The panel will need to decide if this will provide sufficient gains to Mattnz before deciding on an outcome
Contrastinghobby wrote:10.14pm The 2 documents presented will need to be analysed
It contains the top 1000 nrl fantasy teams along with Mattnz forecasted gains from the verdict
The panel will need to decide if this will provide sufficient gains to Mattnz before deciding on an outcome
rhinoceroo wrote:
Defending counsel argues that the top 1,000 teams are not relevant in this case, citing several years of existing data.
Shady2K wrote:Probably $1.01 odds that Brimson is QLD FB now
filthridden wrote:Ironically Walsh will be a real POD for the run home.
mattnz wrote:
Might even be in my team
filthridden wrote:Ironically Walsh will be a real POD for the run home.
mattnz wrote:
Might even be in my team