2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 17

Sik wrote:This probably sounds bananas, but what about the idea of trading Parcell in for (can't believe I'm saying this) CS9. Stay with me while I attempt to make this sound logical and worthwhile.

I have Garvey, who will be out within weeks, but is still churning out cash. So I'll keep him in until Lichaa returns. Trade in Parcell for Smith.

1. He's making cash.
2. He is potentially going to be a gun.

So when Garvey is done I'll bring Smith back in. So then will ride the roller coaster of whether Parcell gets to 'Gun' status or , the prtrade him out when he plateaus out with the cash from The Garvey trade and the value for Parcell to bring in a 2nd gun. Then my hookers will be set and forget, assuming there is no injuries.

Clear as mud? Thoughts?

Sik wrote:This probably sounds bananas, but what about the idea of trading Parcell in for (can't believe I'm saying this) CS9. Stay with me while I attempt to make this sound logical and worthwhile.

I have Garvey, who will be out within weeks, but is still churning out cash. So I'll keep him in until Lichaa returns. Trade in Parcell for Smith.

1. He's making cash.
2. He is potentially going to be a gun.

So when Garvey is done I'll bring Smith back in. So then will ride the roller coaster of whether Parcell gets to 'Gun' status or trade him out when he plateaus out with the cash from The Garvey trade and the value for Parcell to bring in a 2nd gun. Then my hookers will be set and forget, assuming there is no injuries.

Clear as mud? Thoughts?

Fortitude wrote:I currently running with the crowd with Garvey and Smith as hookers, DCE, Jnik, ATaylor and Hastings in halves.

Problem im facing is, I want to improve the scoring in the halves, cant bring in Parcell due to lack of DPP currently.

With 90K in the bank, and Jnik looking like his time is running out, who do you look at bringing in?

Feel ive missed the money train on Walker, and i don't see any other players that represent value sub 300k (which is why they are sub 300k)

Any advice?

Sik wrote:This probably sounds bananas, but what about the idea of trading Parcell in for (can't believe I'm saying this) CS9. Stay with me while I attempt to make this sound logical and worthwhile.

I have Garvey, who will be out within weeks, but is still churning out cash. So I'll keep him in until Lichaa returns. Trade in Parcell for Smith.

1. He's making cash.
2. He is potentially going to be a gun.

So when Garvey is done I'll bring Smith back in. So then will ride the roller coaster of whether Parcell gets to 'Gun' status or trade him out when he plateaus out with the cash from The Garvey trade and the value for Parcell to bring in a 2nd gun. Then my hookers will be set and forget, assuming there is no injuries.

Clear as mud? Thoughts?

Welshy wrote:

FWIW I looked at going Hastings - Norman as I couldn't generate the cash to go JNiko - Norman

but Hastings still has a fair bit of cash to earn

m0nty (FanLeague) wrote:So, I have one R left to allocate: Evans, Packer, JNiko or Taylor. All four averaging within a point of each other. I just know I am going to get this one wrong. My lean is towards Packer.

GreenMachine wrote:

Realise they have some cash to make but quite simply the worst template set of halves I can recall in fantasy:
JNik Hastings Taylor


As 3 of the 4. I was all over DCE and Hodkinson as rookies but this current lot is so uninspiring. I corrected it this week and got in SJ before his double and assist. It ,just tilts me so much how bad this lot are that I don't even want my 10-20k per week

Welshy wrote:

Don't forget $88,000 A Reynolds. What a joy that was!

Welshy wrote:

Don't forget $88,000 A Reynolds. What a joy that was!

GreenMachine wrote:

Realise they have some cash to make but quite simply the worst template set of halves I can recall in fantasy:
JNik Hastings Taylor


As 3 of the 4. I was all over DCE and Hodkinson as rookies but this current lot is so uninspiring. I corrected it this week and got in SJ before his double and assist. It just tilts me so much how bad this lot are that I don't even want my 10-20k per week