wolfking wrote:
But that just potentially counteracts the trade right? Give up 50 points for a trade to get a player in to score 40 or 50?
Obviously you trade in a player that scores 80. Simple maths
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
wolfking wrote:
But that just potentially counteracts the trade right? Give up 50 points for a trade to get a player in to score 40 or 50?
wolfking wrote:
But that just potentially counteracts the trade right? Give up 50 points for a trade to get a player in to score 40 or 50?
Shady2K wrote:
Obviously you trade in a player that scores 80. Simple maths
Khany wrote:Expecting Papy to be on the Storm extended bench
Camo123 wrote:
For example I’ll be out of trades with no HOK cover.
If Grant was injured, I would spend 50 points to gain a HOK for 3 rounds and probably gain 100 points overall. I think we discussed last year and ideal point deficit would be around 100-150
Aardvark wrote:We had plenty of trades this year, certainly enough to manage you through the byes and jump on most of the cashies.
I’d be unhappy if someone in front of me with zero trades left was able to partially negate that in the final rounds by buying a trade. The cost would have to be punitive and even then if there’s three round left and it costs you a score in one you still come out ahead.
wolfking wrote:Milchcow wrote:
If they went this route, it would be better to charge points, rather than dollars.
I think 40-50 points for an extra trade would be an appropiate cost.
But that just potentially counteracts the trade right? Give up 50 points for a trade to get a player in to score 40 or 50?
Milchcow wrote:
i think the more interesting twist would be allowing a wildcard once a season.
Would result in a few interesting strategies.
Use it early to maximise cash generation and pick up all the good cheapies.
Use it during origin to maximise bye player availability
Use it post origin to get in final 17 ASAP
Would also want to reduce max trades per week back down to 2 (3 in the big byes) as post-origin 4 trades is almost as good as a wildcard anyway.
WT Winfield wrote:People will be more prepared next season now that we know the impact of the weekly byes and if you're planning to play 13 for the major byes, make sure you save a few before grabbing midrangers and cheapies for 1-2 scores.
Milchcow wrote:
i think the more interesting twist would be allowing a wildcard once a season.
Would result in a few interesting strategies.
Use it early to maximise cash generation and pick up all the good cheapies.
Use it during origin to maximise bye player availability
Use it post origin to get in final 17 ASAP
Would also want to reduce max trades per week back down to 2 (3 in the big byes) as post-origin 4 trades is almost as good as a wildcard anyway.
WT Winfield wrote:I think they nailed it with the trades this year. The main reason I quit after 2018 was the reduced squads and no additional trades, but the extras this season enticed me to come back. I might stumble at the death with only 2 left, but I can think of a few that I pissed away and probably some others I'd rather not be reminded of.
People will be more prepared next season now that we know the impact of the weekly byes and if you're planning to play 13 for the major byes, make sure you save a few before grabbing midrangers and cheapies for 1-2 scores.
lukeayee wrote:
A few people on this forum would like to see that.
WT Winfield wrote:I think they nailed it with the trades this year. The main reason I quit after 2018 was the reduced squads and no additional trades, but the extras this season enticed me to come back. I might stumble at the death with only 2 left, but I can think of a few that I pissed away and probably some others I'd rather not be reminded of.
People will be more prepared next season now that we know the impact of the weekly byes and if you're planning to play 13 for the major byes, make sure you save a few before grabbing midrangers and cheapies for 1-2 scores.