I have 12 players for R13 (before trading). Lussick > J.Brailey will give me 13.
Trying to field 17 next week will be a challenge. Haha!
.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
code delta wrote:Find it a bit frustrating that our scores this week determine our ranking for the start of eliminator next round.
Have 11 starters before trades. Grant and Api are hookers that I won't be trading so I'll get Faamausili's low score as AE.
code delta wrote:Find it a bit frustrating that our scores this week determine our ranking for the start of eliminator next round.
Have 11 starters before trades. Grant and Api are hookers that I won't be trading so I'll get Faamausili's low score as AE.
TheWeapon wrote:
I'll probably need to score well and get the eliminator bye....
Milchcow wrote:
You don't need to fill every position.
So if you had 5 WFB scorers, but no playing hooker, you could name your WFB4 and WFB5 in your reserves and their scores would count if they were amongst your best 13.
and in SC if you have both Teddy + Drinkwater in your 17 they'll both count, even if you have no playing hooker.
Roger8 wrote:Do you have this week’s BE’s @Milchow? Thank you in advance
code delta wrote:Find it a bit frustrating that our scores this week determine our ranking for the start of eliminator next round.
Have 11 starters before trades. Grant and Api are hookers that I won't be trading so I'll get Faamausili's low score as AE.
Simon Templar wrote:
That's crazy. It would make more sense to use the Round 12 scores to determine the rankings.
Also, with Rounds 13, 16, and 19 already excluded from he Eliminator, it would also make sense to exclude Rounds 14, 17, and 20.
.
Roger8 wrote:I need some clarification!
Looking to loop Aitken’s 80 but it would mean I need to leave Teddy, Manu or May out of my 17. In a normal round, I would just get them as an emergency score but this from the help section makes me think I won’t get them as an emergency:
If you end up with less than 13 scoring players on your selected Starting 17, but you have unselected players your bench who actually play, the usual automatic emergency rule will apply (i.e. you'll receive the score of your lowest-scoring player on your bench).
So say I left May out of my 17, he wouldn’t come in for one of my 17 who scored zero? (I have 16 this week)
StuDogg101 wrote:Roger8 wrote:I need some clarification!
Looking to loop Aitken’s 80 but it would mean I need to leave Teddy, Manu or May out of my 17. In a normal round, I would just get them as an emergency score but this from the help section makes me think I won’t get them as an emergency:
If you end up with less than 13 scoring players on your selected Starting 17, but you have unselected players your bench who actually play, the usual automatic emergency rule will apply (i.e. you'll receive the score of your lowest-scoring player on your bench).
So say I left May out of my 17, he wouldn’t come in for one of my 17 who scored zero? (I have 16 this week)
You'll get the AE as per usual
Milchcow wrote:
If you have 16 scoring players, you won't get an AE
As you won't have less than 13 scoring players
But as Teddy is now confirmed out, you should be able to safely drop him from your team to loop in Aitken
Milchcow wrote:
If you have 16 scoring players, you won't get an AE
As you won't have less than 13 scoring players
But as Teddy is now confirmed out, you should be able to safely drop him from your team to loop in Aitken