Camo123 wrote:The simplicity of fantasy games is the scoring rules
Fanhub wouldn’t even want to touch the coding mess that the above would create
Obviously. Barely cope as it is
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Camo123 wrote:The simplicity of fantasy games is the scoring rules
Fanhub wouldn’t even want to touch the coding mess that the above would create
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Is Kris my best option at CTR if I want to loop in Burbos score? Obviously he will be useful going forward
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Is Kris my best option at CTR if I want to loop in Burbos score? Obviously he will be useful going forward
That’s what I have doneLiverpool_Bulldog wrote:Is Kris my best option at CTR if I want to loop in Burbos score? Obviously he will be useful going forward
Camo123 wrote:The simplicity of fantasy games is the scoring rules
Fanhub wouldn’t even want to touch the coding mess that the above would create
Guest wrote:How do you leave this group please?
The Bludger#2 wrote:
Huh?
You're either a "guest" just trying to stir the pot, or a regular who's created an alt to stir the pot.
Just check out if you don't like the chat.
robelgordo wrote:
I think it's not just the coding mess, its that it transfers the issue from one of complaining about bad luck (on field injuries) to complaining about unfairness of a game rule.
So I think Fanhub could (should?) be able to code something like:
- if a starter plays <20 mins, you get an AE
That's pretty simple and clean
But then what if your starter with less than 20 mins still outscores the AE?
What if your bench player goes on in the 22nd minute and off in the 24th with HIA?
It would also capture other injuries, or the very unlikely player gets subbed early and never returns
Just a can of worms.
The best change would be larger squad sizes so it's easier to deal with the week after.
Rabbits21 wrote:Spencer referred to the judiciary as expected.
multiple.scoregasms wrote:Maybe we(not me) should pump the breaks on May based on a single game sample size(with 2 injuries).
multiple.scoregasms wrote:
Maybe we(not me) should pump the breaks on May based on a single game sample size(with 2 injuries). For every Carrigan there is a Josh King, NAS or Luke who show a world of promise and don't deliver
multiple.scoregasms wrote:Maybe we(not me) should pump the breaks on May based on a single game sample size(with 2 injuries). For every Carrigan there is a Josh King, NAS or Luke who show a world of promise and don't deliver
Chewie wrote:What about Smithies instead of May?
60/70 minute Lock, 1ppm, similar price, what's not to like?
BCT05 wrote:I could certainly get on the May train.
At the moment I've got Lolo sitting in my team and don't particularly want him, May would've been ideal for that spot with hindsight of course. Only have a spare $50k atm though and things could get very tricky if some cheapies aren't named as expected tomorrow. Locking in funds with Cook and Teddy was a future me problem at the time.
mattnz wrote:
It was Gender Bender. Looks like they have found the exit.
White Lightning wrote:
why did he leave he was posting a lot i didn't notice any problem he seemed ok
No Worries wrote:Rabbitohs have released prop forward Daniel Suluka Fifita from the remainder of his playing contract, effective immediately, to take up an opportunity with another NRL Club.