NRL Fantasy 2024 Part 9 - I can't even restart my whole team anymore

Milchcow wrote:

Probably should be removed.

The criteria for awarding them seems quite opaque at times, and I think they generate more confusion than any other fantasy stat.

I don't generally comment on individual stats during a game because although I keep an eye on fantasy scores during play, I generally just look at score totals, and don't keep a close eye on stat breakdown

The Pascoe Fiasco wrote:I don’t trust Robson either, but is Cotter + Robson the better option than Hopgood and any shit mid range HOK! I already captained Haas!

Milchcow wrote:

Probably should be removed.

The criteria for awarding them seems quite opaque at times, and I think they generate more confusion than any other fantasy stat.

I don't generally comment on individual stats during a game because although I keep an eye on fantasy scores during play, I generally just look at score totals, and don't keep a close eye on stat breakdown

The Pascoe Fiasco wrote:
Does Rd 1 qualify as big game then?

Chewie wrote:

Milchcow wrote:

Probably should be removed.

The criteria for awarding them seems quite opaque at times, and I think they generate more confusion than any other fantasy stat.

I don't generally comment on individual stats during a game because although I keep an eye on fantasy scores during play, I generally just look at score totals, and don't keep a close eye on stat breakdown

I try to abstain from checking fantasy score when watching games, maybe a quick peek at half-time. Checking scores can lead to a lot of frustration, which takes away from the enjoyment of the game.
I think you need to have a "you win some and you lose some" when it comes to the interpretation of how stats get scored, because they do make mistakes aplenty

Ando wrote:

Mulvy wrote:

You had me at houses down...

Houses or trousers?

mattnz wrote:Just rewatched the Cowboys trial.

Lolo 27 points in 43 minutes.

The game was expansive, not all being played through the middle.

Lolo didn't look very explosive running the ball. The biggest concern was him constantly playing a ball playing lock role, receiving the ball and passing it on immediately. In previous seasons he would have just tucked the ball under his arm and run. Other times he was the dummy runner, with Granville not passing him the ball, every time they were on the Raiders line, when he could probably have scored.

Honeysett wrote:

Chewie wrote:

Milchcow wrote:

Probably should be removed.

The criteria for awarding them seems quite opaque at times, and I think they generate more confusion than any other fantasy stat.

I don't generally comment on individual stats during a game because although I keep an eye on fantasy scores during play, I generally just look at score totals, and don't keep a close eye on stat breakdown

I try to abstain from checking fantasy score when watching games, maybe a quick peek at half-time. Checking scores can lead to a lot of frustration, which takes away from the enjoyment of the game.
I think you need to have a "you win some and you lose some" when it comes to the interpretation of how stats get scored, because they do make mistakes aplenty

When did you of all wookies turn into such a soft cock?

StormTrooper96 wrote:Been tossing

standard-issue wrote:

I resemble that.

mattnz wrote:

His finals series and Origin games definitely qualify. 1st game as captain, probably.

StormTrooper96 wrote:Been tossing between cotter and Elliot for my last mid spot. Ended up going with cotter because he should be funner to watch. You watch the cowboys and you know when he is on the field.

StormTrooper96 wrote:Been tossing between cotter and Elliot for my last mid spot. Ended up going with cotter because he should be funner to watch. You watch the cowboys and you know when he is on the field.

Mulvy wrote:

standard-issue wrote:

I resemble that.

Oh no, sshhhh. Everyone be really quiet. SI is lurking around with his fancy smancy multiple quotes.. thing.