NRL Fantasy 2024 Part 15 - 1 week ban for any fantasy related posts on P51

Hosking is gonna be 800k isn't he lol

WT Winfield wrote:Hopefully goalkicks count towards KM.. Foggy's 800 average in danger

If they did Zac Lomax would be an elite keeper.

Milchcow wrote:
I don't want to say correlation  = causation,  but 14-0 to 14-12 after taking Seyfarth off

I wasn't watching the first 20 mins just listening to it. Were the tries off the back of Seyfarth missing tackles?

Dont think whitehead will be getting that 12 back.

How Hosking doesn't become a mainstay in whichever team he is in amazes me. It's the others who need to take the spot off him

Milchcow wrote:
How has Hosking never had a secure first grade position.  Surely he holds his spot when Whitehead comes back

Legit starting player

Revraiser wrote:I'm hardly noticing Smithies at all. Is it me ?

Not really, I think people were overhyping him in terms of irl here last week, but he's still good for fantasy, one of the best scorers out there.

Turns out Hosking was the best cashcow

Milchcow wrote:
How has Hosking never had a secure first grade position.  Surely he holds his spot when Whitehead comes back

I said that last week. What does Whitehead offer that Hosking doesn't? Other than a bit of "leadership" and other intangibles like that, I don't think he offers anything above Hosking. I can see Hosking cementing himself just like Horse did last year. Just be so good you can't be dropped.

Hosking stop please, give it one week. You have done enough today

I'm horny for Hosking right now

RandomSil wrote:

I wasn't watching the first 20 mins just listening to it. Were the tries off the back of Seyfarth missing tackles?

He missed a few in quick succession. Leftside defence of Sullivan, Toa, Staines also looking suspect

Snatchpato wrote:
I said that last week. What does Whitehead offer that Hosking doesn't? Other than a bit of "leadership" and other intangibles like that, I don't think he offers anything above Hosking. I can see Hosking cementing himself just like Horse did last year. Just be so good you can't be dropped.

Just wish I'd grabbed himself soon as he was named rd1

Well done those who started with Hosking

[quote="Milchcow"]
Same, but my risk tolerance is fairly low. You won't find me choosing a player whose role is not secure. With that said, he would've been a great short term punt (with some long-term upside).

How could we have known he'd play so well in the first two rounds though?

Really wanted to start with Hosking cause I like him as a player, couldn't fit him in. Should've tried to make it work somehow

Snatchpato wrote:

How could we have known he'd play so well in the first two rounds though?

It's a total mystery

Kris

lol

Looking back should've been obvious to start with Hosking over McInnes. Woops