NRL Fantasy 2024 Part 28 - Oooofft

Loomer wrote:Getting Chevy. If Iro keeps spot shame on me

danseels1985 wrote:Silly looping question,my bench set up had Levi at 14 but if I move Cleary there do I get Talaus points?

14 Cleary
15 Salmon
16 SJ
17 Galvin

18 Hughes
19 Talau
20 Piakura
21 Levi

Toothlessshark wrote:

Dangerous contact with the kickers legs I'd how legs get broken and that's not good for anyone.
But don't add rules to remove blockers which exposes kickers and then penalise what was not dangerous contact. And then to take a shot from where it lands instead of the location of the associated illegal play is having a laugh

danseels1985 wrote:Silly looping question,my bench set up had Levi at 14 but if I move Cleary there do I get Talaus points?

14 Cleary
15 Salmon
16 SJ
17 Galvin

18 Hughes
19 Talau
20 Piakura
21 Levi

danseels1985 wrote:Silly looping question,my bench set up had Levi at 14 but if I move Cleary there do I get Talaus points?

14 Cleary
15 Salmon
16 SJ
17 Galvin

18 Hughes
19 Talau
20 Piakura
21 Levi

Finch wrote:

I mentioned earlier in the week about Egan & CNK but nobody had a nibble

I was on both really, but cash and other trades more of a necessity.

Snatchpato wrote:
Disagree it shouldn't be a penalty, agree that is should be a penalty where player was illegally struck, not where the ball lands.

Toothlessshark wrote:

Dangerous contact with the kickers legs I'd how legs get broken and that's not good for anyone.
But don't add rules to remove blockers which exposes kickers and then penalise what was not dangerous contact. And then to take a shot from where it lands instead of the location of the associated illegal play is having a laugh

Toothlessshark wrote:

Dangerous contact with the kickers legs I'd how legs get broken and that's not good for anyone.
But don't add rules to remove blockers which exposes kickers and then penalise what was not dangerous contact. And then to take a shot from where it lands instead of the location of the associated illegal play is having a laugh

Ando wrote:Strange is playing tomorrow

mickspicks wrote:

I went with your mention of CNK. A true effort player with even more of a point to prove this year with RTS in the team.

Snatchpato wrote:
Disagree it shouldn't be a penalty, agree that is should be a penalty where player was illegally struck, not where the ball lands.

Loomer wrote:

Yes but that's the rule

Toothlessshark wrote:

Dangerous contact with the kickers legs I'd how legs get broken and that's not good for anyone.
But don't add rules to remove blockers which exposes kickers and then penalise what was not dangerous contact. And then to take a shot from where it lands instead of the location of the associated illegal play is having a laugh

BBowler wrote:

So you take away the advantage of the metres gained on the kick. That is pretty good reason to commit the foul in the first place. It’s always going to be where the kick lands.

mattnz wrote:




This was Ilias getting a broken leg last week. Same situation, can't have a guy running full speed putting all his body weight through the kicker's leg. Just sheer stupidity.