NRL Fantasy 2024 Part 35 - TerMAYnation time

mattnz wrote:
Sounds to me like they will need Nat in the prop rotation.

robelgordo wrote:If you have Hynes and no Cleary, congrats on being a winner.

If you have Cleary and no Hynes, I think pivoting to Hynes (either through cash reserves or a straight Cleary to Hynes trade) is a no brainer.

If you have both, I think hold for more clarity next week (at least that's what I'm telling myself)

If you have neither, I dunno, pray?

filthridden wrote:May, Chester, Strange ---> Armstrong, Weekes, Hynes.


Means I have to play Kris in the centres but it might be worth it for a week just to get captain Hynes in.

easytiger wrote:

Seems like it probably is worth it.
Hynes has played at halfback against the Dragons four times for:  94, 98, 89, 89

A single try in each of the his 3 lowest scoring games, and a tryless 98...

Maybe he's due for a quiet one, but if he scores another 89+ it seems he goes up $65k+

easytiger wrote:

Seems like it probably is worth it.
Hynes has played at halfback against the Dragons four times for:  94, 98, 89, 89

A single try in each of the his 3 lowest scoring games, and a tryless 98...

Maybe he's due for a quiet one, but if he scores another 89+ it seems he goes up $65k+

robelgordo wrote:

You haven't factored in that I wlll be there, I might even boo Nicho to put him off and knock off 30 fantasy pts or so

mickspicks wrote:

The only thing with Hynes is with Cleary being cautiously monitored, you'd think he's 100% a shoe in for NSW. Awkward timing on him now. But if he averages 90 over the next three weeks then I guess its worth it.

the_great_wobbler wrote:

I have both having held for 4 weeks and think I'm selling now. If they're resting him now chances are he likely doesn't play r14 etc so I'd be holding for 3 games before origin when he's a probable sell now anyway. Keeping Terrell and hoping JWH niggle persists.

mickspicks wrote:

The only thing with Hynes is with Cleary being cautiously monitored, you'd think he's 100% a shoe in for NSW. Awkward timing on him now. But if he averages 90 over the next three weeks then I guess its worth it.

easytiger wrote:

I would need to see your reserve grade stats before I can factor you in

mickspicks wrote:

The only thing with Hynes is with Cleary being cautiously monitored, you'd think he's 100% a shoe in for NSW. Awkward timing on him now. But if he averages 90 over the next three weeks then I guess its worth it.

robelgordo wrote:

At Henson Park my enthusiasm once lifted Daniel Mortimer to a two try, 2-3 assist MoTM performance. He looked like Jonathan Thurston that day.

robelgordo wrote:

You haven't factored in that I wlll be there, I might even boo Nicho to put him off and knock off 30 fantasy pts or so

mrbrownstone wrote:Cowboys fans, what are you expecting the edge rotation to look like with Luki back? Does he get a couple of 20 min games then back to it? Is he even a guarantee to reclaim the starting role?

Trying to figure out whether it's worth going a week or two early on selling Finefeuiaki. Can squeeze some more cash out of him most likely, but he's made me 154k so job done, and gotta balance the potential further gains vs the lost cost opportunity of missing out on a Brailey/Garrick/Walker type this week.

Toothlessshark wrote:Is there a process anyone is going through to determine who is less likely to shit the bed between
Weekes/Armstrong/Atkinson I'm thinking in the order written.

Weekes - scored well in a side that probably won't get pounded like that again and points were base but history doesn't full with confidence

Armstrong - looked good, ran hard but probably doesn't score tries and attacking stats every game

Atkinson - plays in a good side and should get attacking stats but considering they pumped raiders didn't do heaps.

Would like other opinions

Rabbits21 wrote:

Spoiler:

My Game Day preview

Toothlessshark wrote:Is there a process anyone is going through to determine who is less likely to shit the bed between
Weekes/Armstrong/Atkinson I'm thinking in the order written.

Weekes - scored well in a side that probably won't get pounded like that again and points were base but history doesn't full with confidence

Armstrong - looked good, ran hard but probably doesn't score tries and attacking stats every game

Atkinson - plays in a good side and should get attacking stats but considering they pumped raiders didn't do heaps.

Would like other opinions