2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 22

I know but like GI for instance is a guy who probably features in way more casual teams then serious ones. 20% ownership.

Scouter wrote:Is Johnson a bit of a pod amongst the serious teams? Looking at going DCE>Johnson as Warriors could be on the verge of there mid season purple patch.

I wouldn't call him a POD.. 28% ownership and I imagine a lot of serious teams would have arguably the best half in their team. I have Milford and my next two guns to trade in will be Fensom and SJ.

Mighty Fishes wrote:Hmm what trades would you do.

Carter to Fensom & Green to Holland

OR

Turner to Fensom and Rochow to RTS

B for Barracuda (or Barramundi).

Here are the buttercups who will undoubtedly build me up just to let me down again this week

Smith (Parcell)
Woods JDB (Lawrence)
Surgess Merrin Fensom (Whitehead)
Walker Hastings (Taylor)
Dugan Croker
Inglis Gordon Barba

NPR: Packer, J.Saifiti, Patmat, Holland, Mitchell, Gutherson, Leuleuai, Feeney

Taking on RNGD Kiwivillans in L6 this week. Is he a poster on here?

Pookus McFly wrote:Here are the buttercups who will undoubtedly build me up just to let me down again this week

Smith (Parcell)
Woods JDB (Lawrence)
Surgess Merrin Fensom (Whitehead)
Walker Hastings (Taylor)
Dugan Croker
Inglis Gordon Barba

NPR: Packer, J.Saifiti, Patmat, Holland, Mitchell, Gutherson, Leuleuai, Feeney

Taking on RNGD Kiwivillans in L6 this week. Is he a poster on here?

I'll be over at ten

Just checked the rankings in Pandas League of Extraordinary Gentlemen and I am ranked #1. May as well brag about that shit now before I plummet to last place in my very own League like filthridden.

Anyone watching NRL 360? Ikin calling for transparency in team lists. Had some really good reasons, but the important one was for fantasy players (or "supercoach" players as Ikin branded us all).
Man is wise.

Loomer wrote:

I'll be over at ten

Ah no kidding, Loomer? You arn't by any chance Emmett Sutton on Renegades? This is a silly place to mention it, but you are one of the few Renegades that I actually don't mind. Makes sense that you are here too
Battle of the Merrin's? Now I definitely can't sell him.

Yeah that's me. Who are you?

Pookus McFly wrote:Anyone watching NRL 360? Ikin calling for transparency in team lists. Had some really good reasons, but the important one was for fantasy players (or "supercoach" players as Ikin branded us all).
Man is wise.

Probably had Garvey in his SC team.

You posted that twice. But it was good, so I liked both posts

Pookus McFly wrote:

Ah no kidding, Loomer? You arn't by any chance Emmett Sutton on Renegades? This is a silly place to mention it, but you are one of the few Renegades that I actually don't mind. Makes sense that you are here too
Battle of the Merrin's? Now I definitely can't sell him.

Now you can't sell Merrin? I mean, you could also try and win the H2H? Or not, I'm in L6 too.

Loomer wrote:Yeah that's me. Who are you?

He is the turkey. He was the turkey all along.

If you had to sell one of Turner or Rochow -> RTS, which would you do?

Loomer wrote:Yeah that's me. Who are you?

Luken Rijnbout. But doubt you would know me, because these days I am just being a dick, which makes me blend in. but in Renegades, people who make sense stick out like sore thumbs

Bren wrote:

He is the turkey. He was the turkey all along.

ahhh, stop it, I am sick of giving you likes today!

Ben Hunt's Butterfingers wrote:

Now you can't sell Merrin? I mean, you could also try and win the H2H? Or not, I'm in L6 too.

If I keep Merrin, he scores 40. If I sell Merrin, he scores 80. Pretty basic fantasy bro

Ben Hunt's Butterfingers wrote:If you had to sell one of Turner or Rochow -> RTS, which would you do?

Definitely Turner. Probably a week premature, but doubt he will gain more than 5-8k; Rochow has a much better chance of pumping out a 50 and some price rises

Pookus McFly wrote:

If I keep Merrin, he scores 40. If I sell Merrin, he scores 80. Pretty basic fantasy bro

I'm selling Merrin or maybe not... 

You have Fensom that worries me

Pookus McFly wrote:Anyone watching NRL 360? Ikin calling for transparency in team lists. Had some really good reasons, but the important one was for fantasy players (or "supercoach" players as Ikin branded us all).
Man is wise.

It's really just foolish asking clubs to name teams on a Tuesday.
Triply so for teams that have played on Monday.

But Tuesday teams are before judiciary hearings. She there are several training sessions for fringe players to put their hand up, or for anyone to get injured.

The best solution is to just do away with them altogether. Not that that will make fantasy players happy.

Maybe I'm just used to soccer where you get no such luxury as teams named days in advance.