NRL Fantasy 2024 Part 49 - "Super" Sunday. Just super.

Lussick had better stay where he is

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:This Brailey nonsense has really put a dampener on what could have been a good fantasy day. 

Any explanation or is a coach about to be sacked?

He didn't shed too much light on it when asked in the pre-match interview. Just said Brailey has been playing well and doing a lot of work and wanted to try out Crossland starting and give Brailey a bit of a break.

Weiland wrote:

He didn't shed too much light on it when asked in the pre-match interview. Just said Brailey has been playing well and doing a lot of work and wanted to try out Crossland starting and give Brailey a bit of a break.

Hmmm still have Salmon and Hughes to play so I guess we can make that 3 sub 30s this week

650/13 playing one short, figjam.

Knights play last next week, very unhelpful. Even if Brailey is named to start on TLT you still wouldn't feel good about it.

Having a good ‘un, rank in about 40% with Wighton to loop in plus 4 tomorrow.

YOLO’d in Jahrome to finish 4/4 for good scores by new players this week, just wish I’d done it for Brails instead of yeeting his brother Sammy

I wasn’t planning to run a hooker in R16 but if Brailey needs selling I’ll at least get the extra player there I suppose

Slight concern I’m going to using 4 in R20 to sort out team and be playing with 12 in R27

666 with 5 to play.

Matto to the Carty Party might be the go

Weiland wrote:

He didn't shed too much light on it when asked in the pre-match interview. Just said Brailey has been playing well and doing a lot of work and wanted to try out Crossland starting and give Brailey a bit of a break.

That’s a hell of a curious decision to give a player playing well a break against the Storm of all teams.

BCT05 wrote:Knights play last next week, very unhelpful. Even if Brailey is named to start on TLT you still wouldn't feel good about it.

and playing Panthers who don’t cover either R16 or R19, so even if you’re not after any specific position, options are going to be slim

656 with 5 to play

Bring on the Party tomorrow

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:This Brailey nonsense has really put a dampener on what could have been a good fantasy day. 

Any explanation or is a coach about to be sacked?

I think rabbit summed it up a few pages ago. When he came on they looked heaps better

kamikamicameleons wrote:Just realised Gagai is cheaper than Kiraz now. Feels like a luxury trade, but man it's tempting

Maybe not anymore... Well done to anyone that picked him up... I ruled him out as he was not playing R16

750 with 3 shittos that I don't keep high expectations of

Rabbit wrote:

713/13C.

you : Kiraz, Brown +3
me : Tuilagi, Hopgood

Photo.

673/13 no C yet
Gumbies: Tuilagi and Ming + 40 points
Porpoises: 2nd Hopgood, Russell and Hughes
Both: 1st Hopgood and Hands

I might need to trade out Russell to a MID to gain spots

Ming's out on paternity leave right

BCT05 wrote:Knights play last next week, very unhelpful. Even if Brailey is named to start on TLT you still wouldn't feel good about it.

Straight in the loop when game opens

Camo123 wrote:

Straight in the loop when game opens

I can’t wait for next week. Being forced into not playing Shoes and Salmon will be great

643 C with 3 to play. Looks like I'm dropping ranks again

L-Jimmy wrote:Damn, DCE will be sub 700 soon. That crazy cheap

If Galvin decides to stop putting in (so he can get an early release), he can become DCE for the run home.

my tv broke wrote:

Newcastle

Really. Is that how far the Knights have fallen.
God I hate NRL sometimes.

Congrats ref for the Storm win - let's pretend forward passes never happen.