mattnz wrote:
Porter isnt averaging 16 in his position.
Bruh, he's played 2 games lol.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
mattnz wrote:
Porter isnt averaging 16 in his position.
mattnz wrote:Porter isnt averaging 16 in his position.Milchcow wrote:
This is strange advice coming from a guy who wants to trade in Reuben Porter
Milchcow wrote:
If he scores 16 this weekend, it would be his second highest score.
But I specifically highlighted the part of your post suggesting there was poor job security and a chance of getting dropped
mattnz wrote:
Cleary, Hynes, injuries.
Bateman was expected R17 (post 7 June saying expected in 3 weeks)mattnz wrote:
Its risk reward, why pay $230k for a guy who could be dropped and if he isn't averages 16 in the position he is named, vs paying $244k for a guy that is currently starting EDG, getting decent minutes and should score decently if he holds that position until Bateman returns.
Very different risk / reward profiles. One is medium risk / high reward, the other is medium risk / low reward.
Camo123 wrote:
Bateman was expected R17 (post 7 June saying expected in 3 weeks)
Was going to link it to save me posting twicemattnz wrote:
Currently showing as R19/20.
my tv broke wrote:
Youll use 6 or 7 of your last trades the moment the come available, injuries or not
Like most os us will.
Its not even a dig on you here, we all love trading "up". But you shouldnt use your last trade in rnd 16 on porter lol
mattnz wrote:Milchcow wrote:
If he scores 16 this weekend, it would be his second highest score.
But I specifically highlighted the part of your post suggesting there was poor job security and a chance of getting dropped
Its risk reward, why pay $230k for a guy who could be dropped and if he isn't averages 16 in the position he is named, vs paying $244k for a guy that is currently starting EDG, getting decent minutes and should score decently if he holds that position until Bateman returns.
Very different risk / reward profiles. One is medium risk / high reward, the other is medium risk / low reward.
BCT05 wrote:I have 10 this week (for now) but one is Koula so make it a generous 9.5.
Will just be rolling with that, no trades. Until two of them are late outs that is.
Camo123 wrote:Garrick to keeper playing R16 and R17 (Teddy, Tapine, Mahoney) is pretty sideways isn’t it? The latter two would play 2 extra games…
I have 12 before trades (5 left) and then 4 bye/Grant & Cotter Origin backup for 17 so trying to ease load there.
Camo123 wrote:Garrick to keeper playing R16 and R17 (Teddy, Tapine, Mahoney) is pretty sideways isn’t it? The latter two would play 2 extra games…
I have 12 before trades (5 left) and then 4 bye/Grant & Cotter Origin backup for 17 so trying to ease load there.
Camo123 wrote:Garrick to keeper playing R16 and R17 (Teddy, Tapine, Mahoney) is pretty sideways isn’t it? The latter two would play 2 extra games…
I have 12 before trades (5 left) and then 4 bye/Grant & Cotter Origin backup for 17 so trying to ease load there.
L-Jimmy wrote:Sitting here thanking the RNG gods that I'm able to field 13 green dots and don't have to trade this week. Bitch of a week to be trading.
Sympathetic fistbumps all around.