NRL Fantasy 2024 Part 54 - Will the real Jake Sully please stand up

Hynes (C), Iro, King in that one.

Could've been a lot worse.

It is what it is.

Trindall with 16 points from kicking a big difference for Hynes this season.

Stoked with King’s score, was actually planning on cashing him out next week

Oh god, Bulldogs vs Warriors next week

Kiraz going to get 100

Hynes didn't make 50.

Teeth Eater wrote:Hynes didn't make 50.

He might actually be owed a TB, can't remember

Teeth Eater wrote:Hynes didn't make 50.

Still owed that FDO, so if he doesn't lose any points, he should scrap it in.

Welshy wrote:Hynes will get to 50 easy

Someone can change my avatar for the week if he does'nt

Someone got something lined up?

Anyone brave enough to run without him for the season

Deathriding chapter 1 of 3 successful

wolfking wrote:

Still owed that FDO, so if he doesn't lose any points, he should scrap it in.

Error for missing the field goal (Kick went dead)?

Camo123 wrote:Anyone brave enough to run without him for the season

Honestly, might sell him next week.

Not paying this much for someone scoring 50's

Finch wrote:

Error for missing the field goal (Kick went dead)?

Is that normally given as an error?

I can't remember the last time the Dogs played golden point....let alone winning in golden point.

Camo123 wrote:Anyone brave enough to run without him for the season

Looks like he gets cheap enough that everyone gets him anyway.

Will be about $860k with another 100+ BE next week. Probably going to be cheaper than Cleary when he bottoms out.

wolfking wrote:

Is that normally given as an error?

Not sure but it should be considering all the negatives given for everything else and not saying as salty non owner

wolfking wrote:

Is that normally given as an error?

I think so?

Someone more experienced can help us

Hughes I would’ve taken 25-30, 37 is a bonus

Hynes shit. Sharks are pretenders

Finch wrote:

Honestly, might sell him next week.

Not paying this much for someone scoring 50's

He's shit enough to sell, but it'd be a hard thing to cop losing that 200K or so and seeing him turn it around in a couple of weeks. They allegedly have a good draw, but jeez they can look terrible without warning.

I'm pretty serious about captaining Hughes over him until there's a reason not to, but I won't sell the spud.

wolfking wrote:

Is that normally given as an error?

Nope

There isn't an error for missing a field goal, or kicking dead (or maybe Burton is owed a heap of negatives too)