ELIMINATOR 2024

robelgordo wrote:R32 RESULTS - RED (dirty & western) BRACKET

Spoiler:

easytiger continued the horror run for top seeds by beating wolfking. Next he faces cantbeatwinners - don't let the 55th seed fool you, winners is on a winning run - 17th overall in July, and in from 110th to 52nd in FOG. Also narrowly beating me in Autofill and probably will beat me this week in L1 draft semi.

And the charge continues with a huge 1013 for B/L, the 6th and last 1000+ score from the 32 eliminator entrants. Now faces Aardvark.

The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:Well done KamiKamiChameleon

You won because Haas got injured. It would have been so much better had he just not played the game. I would have received Hands score instead and got through to the next round

The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:

Is that also why you cannot make the top 8 of lowly league 9?

It is a pandemic and MattNZ is ground zero

robelgordo wrote:I haven’t checked past years to back this claim up, but seems like a year of eliminator upsets.

Of the last 16, only 2 (MTB 8, L-Jimmy 13) are in the top 16 seeds

The highest possible seeded final is 8 v 26. 55 v 56 is also possible as the lowest seeded final

kamikamicameleons wrote:

Congrats on the upcoming win I guess @revraiser

Cantbeatwinners wrote:

2 massive fixtures, @easytiger a super player who'll be very difficult to beat, about 4 or 5 different players to me, and @robelgordo in the draft league1 semi, who's come from 6th to try and do the damage, he has a great team, gonna be difficult for me to progress in both comps.

L-Jimmy wrote:Love your work Rob!

Also @manlybeaver mate you're going down pound town lester brown all round - just so you know

B/L wrote:The charge continues.

robelgordo wrote:Likely updating this on Wednesday

my tv broke wrote:

Onto my fifth angry email it is then

robelgordo wrote:

Was just going to do it then was like, "wait team list Tuesday in 10 mins"

I am a master of suspense

robelgordo wrote:Uhh I'm getting "unknown errors" when I try and upload the bracket result images, so will have to try again later tonight. And if it doesn't work, might be writing up the old fashioned way

standard-issue wrote:

Need me to sort it mate?