2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 45

I traded in Hurrell & Lolohea when i was sitting on a handful of trades, then promptly traded them out soon after. We all make them

I'm playing Lone Scout in one of my h2h's & there seems to be a bit of D. Long going on. On Friday after the Broncos game I noticed he had Opacic's score locked in his 17. I look this morning & Opacic is in his npr's. Sounds like LS has got fanhub to change his team after the fact. There needs to be an investigation haha.

White Lightning wrote:I'm playing Lone Scout in one of my h2h's & there seems to be a bit of D. Long going on. On Friday after the Broncos game I noticed he had Opacic's score locked in his 17. I look this morning & Opacic is in his npr's. Sounds like LS has got fanhub to change his team after the fact. There needs to be an investigation haha.

Did you screenshot it? If so post em up.

Where is TBO. Maybe he can predict Bmoz scores from now until round 26

SI wrote:
We all have regrets mate, it's how you react to them that matters.  Drop me a line if you need to talk.

I have a spare ticket to the Cure tonight. Get on a plane, I'll tell you about it when you get here.

White Lightning wrote:I'm playing Lone Scout in one of my h2h's & there seems to be a bit of D. Long going on. On Friday after the Broncos game I noticed he had Opacic's score locked in his 17. I look this morning & Opacic is in his npr's. Sounds like LS has got fanhub to change his team after the fact. There needs to be an investigation haha.

That's shit if that's the case.

White Lightning wrote:I'm playing Lone Scout in one of my h2h's & there seems to be a bit of D. Long going on. On Friday after the Broncos game I noticed he had Opacic's score locked in his 17. I look this morning & Opacic is in his npr's. Sounds like LS has got fanhub to change his team after the fact. There needs to be an investigation haha.

I don't trust this Fanhub mob...

we need Wikileaks to drop some controversial findings

Talking about Opacic

He was suppose to be an NPR after the Bye period

And Matterson needs to either start or not play at all

I'm at risk of getting a bad AE score with these clowns in my team

So Teddy still recorded with zero tackles. I'm sure I saw him involved in at least 3 tackles? Which is exactly the number they have him down for missing. Anyone watch the game close enough to know for sure?

No Worries wrote:

SI wrote:
We all have regrets mate, it's how you react to them that matters.  Drop me a line if you need to talk.

I have a spare ticket to the Cure tonight. Get on a plane, I'll tell you about it when you get here.

Haha, would have loved too! I too have a spare ticket to The Cure here this Sunday, get on a plane and tell me all about it when you get here

Frol wrote:So Teddy still recorded with zero tackles. I'm sure I saw him involved in at least 3 tackles? Which is exactly the number they have him down for missing. Anyone watch the game close enough to know for sure?

I went through the last game objectively that he got dudded and found around 10 extra points. I will watch the replay of the Dragons game and mark his points down again; not sure when it will be though.

This ripping Teddy off in the points department is really putting me off getting him in next week to be honest. After the try he scored and I think setting up another one, I was surprised to see him on 17 points. I'm really surprised he finished on 31, very strange, although I was making dinner and had the game on in the background so didn't see every minute. Did see a couple of missed tackles from him at the end though.

Just had a look at those disallowed Shark tries... I couldn't see a double movement from Holmes... or an obstruction with Barba's try. Maybe when you watch the images in slow motion... but in real time

Not sure what those guys in the bunker are smoking ?

The Holmes one was a deadset try, that kind of try has been allowed many times before.

The second one looked worse in slow motion.  I think it should have been awarded but can actually see why they disallowed it, but it should have been reviewed in real time too.  Ennis kind of stopped the other player making a tackle by moving forward, but at the same time, what the hell is he suppose to do.  I think it was a good try that should have been awarded. (Would have also been a try assist and LB assist to Gallen.)

I think the Ennis one looked worse (especially in slow motion) because Ennis raises his arm against the player he impedes.

I really don't know why you guys bother trying to score players under your own made-up marking criteria. Not sure I've ever really seen any good come of it.

For what its worth FoxSports Stats also had Teddy on 0 tackles. NRLStats have him on 1 tackle, but stats for that game are not yet final.

I'm not trying to throw a spanner in the works, and I have no reason to think this will happen, but how many people would have a good score ruined with a late Sam Burgess withdrawal tonight?
I have him, but I also have JTurbo that I could sub him with. Lots of bad AE's out there I'm thinking.

Chucky wrote:I'm not trying to throw a spanner in the works, and I have no reason to think this will happen, but how many people would have a good score ruined with a late Sam Burgess withdrawal tonight?
I have him, but I also have JTurbo that I could sub him with. Lots of bad AE's out there I'm thinking.

SAY WHAT?!?

Amen to the sharks disallowed tries. The bunker is debunked, they are making mistakes with the opportunity of replay.
Sammy Burgess smoke followed by fire ?

...getting ready