2017 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 30

quicksand wrote:all the people jumping on Crichton this week. Have you looked at the other forwards minutes for Souths ?

Gurgess - 18
Turgess - 28
Clark - 30
Musgrove - 30

If all 4 get 40 minutes this week that is 54 minutes to come from somewhere. Assuming Surgess and Sutton keep their minutes, the 54 minutes have to come from Turner (50 minutes) and Crichton (80 minutes)

Just some food for thought !!

mulvy wrote:

Yeah but if I mention that there's the whole post a picture thing which I don't quite get and am not very good at the whole gifs things anyways etc etc blah blah

Nyah Nyah you can't retaliate!:

Rabbit wrote:

Surgess plays 70. Turner plays 40 in his new role. Clarke covers for Surgess and in the prop rotation, Farah for Cook. Crichton will play 80 for a while.

BroncHose wrote:Whilst I'm not knocking on what is already an awesome product, and I have no ability to follow thru with this suggestion, but the start of the week is always full of posts like: I'm leaning towards bringing XX in and trading YY out, or AA in for BB. Often these go without response due to lengthy explanations needed.

For those web gurus out there, Is there a way we can replicate the thumbs up/down vote on each post  for an a) or b) vote and not link it to the reputation? Of course people asking would have to offer two solutions to get advice on, but this could also reinforce the "go with your gut" theory.

This could offer people heaps more feedback on proposed solutions without the need for detailed replies. The more experienced and educated could continue to post detailed responses, but allow for short, snappy surveying of collective thoughts.

Anyways, just a thought and not sure if its viable technologically.

I'll close this by reinforcing the initial point - awesome site, good people, good conversation. For a newbie at this fantasy stuff (second year syndrome) - its a wealth of info.

Welshy wrote:
he wont lose much, depends if you need the cash for an upgrade this week

mulvy wrote:So Kelly has peaked but there seems to be no cheapies to cash out except maybe I think Rabs mentioned Faimononono or something, and as much  as i would like bj i don't really need another centre. Hold?

Milchcow wrote:

I've been at the Easter show all day and reading this quite late.

But would you like us to find you a safe space, my little snowflake? Somewhere you can hang out without having to get upset about other people's opinions.

Milchcow wrote:

I've been at the Easter show all day and reading this quite late.

But would you like us to find you a safe space, my little snowflake? Somewhere you can hang out without having to get upset about other people's opinions.

mulvy wrote:So Kelly has peaked but there seems to be no cheapies to cash out ....

mulvy wrote:

Revraiser wrote:

I'd  say it's about time to plug the Mrs Mulvy

Yeah but if I mention that there's the whole post a picture thing which I don't quite get and am not very good at the whole gifs things anyways etc etc blah blah

GreenMachine wrote:Jeeze catholicism and religion. Putting my controversial thoughts that Yvonne is a bit ordinary to shame today boys!

Rabbit wrote:

And exactly who is "us". You don't speak for everyone although you think you do.

GreenMachine wrote:Jeeze catholicism and religion. Putting my controversial thoughts that Yvonne is a bit ordinary to shame today boys!

GreenMachine wrote:Jeeze catholicism and religion. Putting my controversial thoughts that Yvonne is a bit ordinary to shame today boys!

Pookus McFly wrote:Any Smat Owners want to talk some Smat?
Is he really the keeper we envisioned? His three games at second row for 80 mins give him an average of 38.6. Also very prone to the old mid-game centre-switch which classically killed Aubs in the past. The switch to BJ is only going to get more expensive with time.
/Smat