Moose wrote:
Nah he should be playing at hooker
Friday night lols
HS, when are you doing the Moose get-to-know-the-poster-interview?
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Moose wrote:
Nah he should be playing at hooker
Deuces wrote:stone the flamming crows......(for those looking at ranking not h2h)
Pearce 57avg x 7 more games = 399pts
Cleary 49avg x 9 more games = 440pts
Walker & DCE 46avg x 9 more games = 413pts
back to the drawingboard......do i need Pearce.
TysonFrizellsBottomBitch wrote:Hmm, Butcher or Collins worth a punt as a Cash out with a little extra points this week? Any reason to choose one over the other?
Nat Butcher is a gun however his price is to high to be a cash out. Collins is basement price but I don't really know much about him except he scored 3 points in 20 minutes previously.TysonFrizellsBottomBitch wrote:Hmm, Butcher or Collins worth a punt as a Cash out with a little extra points this week? Any reason to choose one over the other?
THEGAME wrote:Any thoughts?
What to do:
Would you trade Smith Jnr to Farah this round if that means you can't get CS9 in round 20?
My other hooker is Friend.
Getting Farah gives me an extra player this and next round.
Do the points Farah scores this and next round, outscore CS9 for the run home?
If I was to trade in Smith in R20, it would need 2 trades also.
Hmm, I'll have to look into this Mullets are a tricky thing to pull off.Johnny B Goode wrote:
Depends how okay you are with Collins mullet. For that I'd be going with Butcher
Why bother risking it mate?TysonFrizellsBottomBitch wrote:I'm sure this won't work, but its early so bear with me... but could i put the C on Surgess, the VC on Crichton and then after the game if Chrichton has scored higher, swap out Surgess with an NPR who hasn't yet played for the loophole? I'm thinking it should work, but I've got a funny feeling it will shit the bed.
difO wrote:anyone know who 9 Jakob Friend (C) is
difO wrote:anyone know who 9 Jakob Friend (C) is
TysonFrizellsBottomBitch wrote:I'm sure this won't work, but its early so bear with me... but could i put the C on Surgess, the VC on Crichton and then after the game if Chrichton has scored higher, swap out Surgess with an NPR who hasn't yet played for the loophole? I'm thinking it should work, but I've got a funny feeling it will shit the bed.
I'm a software tester? I dunno, I'm pretty curious. Maybe i should just play it safe pick one for the VC and then Captain Brown/Kapow/Normy.Welshy wrote:
Why bother risking it mate?
TysonFrizellsBottomBitch wrote:I'm sure this won't work, but its early so bear with me... but could i put the C on Surgess, the VC on Crichton and then after the game if Chrichton has scored higher, swap out Surgess with an NPR who hasn't yet played for the loophole? I'm thinking it should work, but I've got a funny feeling it will shit the bed.
I'm going back to bed... wtf am i thinking this morning. Cheers mate.my tv broke wrote:
You cant move a player once they play bro
TysonFrizellsBottomBitch wrote:I'm sure this won't work, but its early so bear with me... but could i put the C on Surgess, the VC on Crichton and then after the game if Chrichton has scored higher, swap out Surgess with an NPR who hasn't yet played for the loophole? I'm thinking it should work, but I've got a funny feeling it will shit the bed.
TysonFrizellsBottomBitch wrote:
I'm a software tester? I dunno, I'm pretty curious. Maybe i should just play it safe pick one for the VC and then Captain Brown/Kapow/Normy.
White Lightning wrote:difO wrote:anyone know who 9 Jakob Friend (C) is
I cracked up when I saw that. Is he from Czechoslavakia.