Mitchell 31
Aubbs 41
Pearce 59
Ross 27
Gagai 32
Lamb 27
Buhrer 38
SMat 28
Barnett 50
Yates 24
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Finch wrote:
Blessing in disguise for us Fantasy players really.
Has been shit lately.
multiple.scoregasms wrote:I must be the only player in the top 1000 that doesn't own Surgess
I'm apparently in the top 1000 (but wasn't before the start of the round, and also won't be by the end of the round) but I don't own him either. Some luck for me, with 0 trades left!multiple.scoregasms wrote:I must be the only player in the top 1000 that doesn't own Surgess
Finch wrote:Farah though....
wolfking wrote:I've dropped 180 places, but I've only had 4 players play so dunno if that's alright or not.
surmo13 wrote:didn't watch the Roosters/Knights game but saw the reaction to a knock-on in the Tupou try, just watched the vision with the explanation, and i'm not so sure it's as clear-cut as people are suggesting, it looks bad because the angle the ball lands at bounces it forward when it hits the turf, but if you told me to be 100% certain that he has knocked it forward and not straight down, i wouldn't be able to.
SI wrote:
Tolman/SMat/Surgess/Crichton and have dropped around 150 places. Quite a few of the non-Smith owners have had viable Captain's play allready as well.
multiple.scoregasms wrote:I must be the only player in the top 1000 that doesn't own Surgess
Honeysett wrote:
Straight down is also a knock on. 99/100 times that's called a knocked on. 100/100 if it's not against someone like the Knights
Honeysett wrote:
Straight down is also a knock on. 99/100 times that's called a knocked on. 100/100 if it's not against someone like the Knights