2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 21

I hate Robbie FArrah and love the raiders. But I’d take Him. Yeah, he is past his best, but I’d rather have him for the next 15 weeks until Hodgson comes back than this shit rotation they been running with

Surprised Croker got the halves spot over Hastings to start with. Easy trade from Croker to Hastings if he is actually dropped

I had 2 set trades, now everything is up in the air need clarity on the changes, how many NPRs I will have and how loopholes are resolved in what order, as may end up with 3 of them this round

mattnz wrote:I had 2 set trades, now everything is up in the air need clarity on the changes, how many NPRs I will have and how loopholes are resolved in what order, as may end up with 3 of them this round

Just trade out Rapa, its clear to me you don't deserve him.

Archer wrote:
You are so lucky I'm not a mod.

I heard the only reason you are not a mod is because Random wasn't impressed with your dick pics.

Moose wrote:

I heard the only reason you are not a mod is because Random wasn't impressed with your dick pics.

Seriously? Damn, I'd only forwarded the ones you sent me.

Archer wrote:
Seriously? Damn, I'd only forwarded the ones you sent me.

Those were Welshy's. I thought if anyone would recognize his dick it would be you.

is there an email address I can send to, so I can get clarity on the order that Non players are resolved. With 3 of them this week, I really need to know.

Moose wrote:

Those were Welshy's. I thought if anyone would recognize his dick it would be you.

Don't deflect after getting burnt boy.

Might have to reverse Croft to JMK and go for Hastings instead. Would be handy to know how much validity the Sezer to Dogs rumour has.

If Croker gets dropped for any reason other than an injury then that is honestly a kick in the guts to the bloke. I thought he wasn’t doing too badly in the first three rounds. Hell he is probably doing better than Jr Cronk

mattnz wrote:is there an email address I can send to, so I can get clarity on the order that Non players are resolved. With 3 of them this week, I really need to know.

Its times like this i really wish i knew Rab's email.

mattnz wrote:is there an email address I can send to, so I can get clarity on the order that Non players are resolved. With 3 of them this week, I really need to know.

https://fantasy.nrl.com/help/contact-us

WT Winfield wrote:Might have to reverse Croft to JMK and go for Hastings instead. Would be handy to know how much validity the Sezer to Dogs rumour has.

You'd have to question why we'd drop Austin if Sezer was the one likely to be going.
Edit: Also, its from lurker isn't it? I think that says more to the likelihood of it then i ever could. I often wonder if he's an early Machine Learning experiment gone wrong.

WT Winfield wrote:

https://fantasy.nrl.com/help/contact-us

Thanks, have sent them a message, when I get a reply I will let everyone know.

mickspicks wrote:If Croker gets dropped for any reason other than an injury then that is honestly a kick in the guts to the bloke. I thought he wasn’t doing too badly in the first three rounds. Hell he is probably doing better than Jr Cronk

When I read Croker dropped I assumed it was because of his defense but he only missed 2 tackles. Plenty of his team mates missed more tackles.

I would say it was more that Hastings played a blinder in his limited minutes, than poor form from Croker. Griffin should take note!

Archer wrote:
You'd have to question why we'd drop Austin if Sezer was the one likely to be going.
Edit: Also, its from lurker isn't it? I think that says more to the likelihood of it then i ever could. I often wonder if he's an early Machine Learning experiment gone wrong.

Good point about Austin. I was thinking that gives some credibility to the Farah rumour.. Missing that if Sezer was on the outer, they might aswell drop him instead.

I think all 3 transfers were talked about prior to Rd 1, but not sure of any other sources. Might've originated from Lurker in the first place

Welshy wrote:This should settle the Taupau argument
his last 3 years average are almost identical

I’d say 90% chance he doesn’t score over a 52 avg over the full season

I got him thinking he might add a few points to last years average - Im just not a big fan of using an argument thats based on the premise that because in round 2 this year he scored 52 in 36 min you can reasonably extrapolate this out to a 50 minute performance at that same scoring level on a consistent basis. Especially when, as you say, you have a good couple years worth of data to sow otherwise.

I hope he;s right though

As a Kennar and Croker owner with plenty of suitable cover I'm loving the chaos that this is causing. Sorry, not sorry