Cap'n Ranta wrote:
I like the logic in trying to compare the two. But feel you are missing a key point of risk vs reward. Great to compare what you specifically think will happen but its important to consider the range of outcomes as well. Upside vs downside:
Rein:
- hasn't played that many minutes
- role is undefined (we hope 55-80 minutes)
- Average will be somewhere between 35-50 (53 minutes for 35 points last week - 2TBs included there are unexpected)
- Bench doesn't make a heap of sense (Wallace (55), Arrow (65), James (60), Proctor (80) and Rein (60?) playing large minutes with a 4 forward bench (leaves 140 mins for 4 guys and a Cartwright - <30 mins each)?
- Locked in for 3 games
- May get 1-3 more games (unlikely based on coaches comments and Peats fighting for an Origin spot)
- High initial BE - 24 (limits total cash made)
Gosie
- Average will be 30-35
- Very well defined role
- Salary cap, Hastings and injuries mean his spot is secure
- Plays 13
- Low BE this week (4)
When you consider these facts you end up with
Rein may make 63-144k in the next 3 weeks whereas Gosie will make 150 - 210k all up in 7 weeks (with no attacking stats whatsoever)
Gosie adds no scoring potential while Rein should give 0 -15 points per week on average improvement.
So:
Rein will be worth 60 - 195 points over the season
Gosie will be worth 110 - 147 points over the season
A lot of Gosies worth is in playing 13 but see how the risk with Gosie is massively reduced (good total points and cash). You are asking for an average of 42+ to beat the lower range of Gosiewski. With a high BE and more Peats injury news to come next week it feels like waiting has a lot of merit. Sure you'll miss 15 points at most but will avoid the downside of what could be a terrible decision.
This is a good post, and reflects several posts I've made over the last 2 seasons regarding risk-reward and how the individual fantasy coach's goal for the season will probably determine which option they take.
We are playing a game where nearly 100,000 other people are playing too. If your goal is to win the whole thing, most likely taking the safe option will not cut the mustard. One of those 100,000 at least will pull trigger on the correct combination of those risk-reward options and trump those that take the safe options everytime.
On the other hand, if your goal is to beat where you came last year, win your work comp, not come last in your work comp, beat your buddy or what ever, then the safer option will likely be the way to go.
It basically comes down to coach's risk profiles. Some will go one way, some the other. Important thing though is to have the facts (and assumptions) laid out there so you can make the best and most informed decision you can.